Do Children Benefit from Universal Early Childhood Education and Care? A Meta-Analysis of Evidence from Natural Experiments

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

This study examines the effects of universal Early Childhood Education and Care (ECEC) on child development and children’s later life outcomes. Using meta-analytical techniques, we synthesize the findings from recent studies that exploit natural experiments to identify the causal effects of universal ECEC arrangements. We use 250 estimates from 30 studies conducted between 2005 and 2017. Our meta-regressions include estimates on a wide variety of children’s outcomes, ranging from (non-)cognitive development measured during early childhood to educational outcomes and earnings in adulthood. Overall, the evidence on universal ECEC is mixed. Age of enrollment is not a major factor in explaining the impact. Some evidence indicates that more intensive programs produce more favorable outcomes. Program quality matters critically: high quality arrangements consistently generate positive child outcomes. Publicly provided programs produce more favorable effects than privately provided (and mixed) programs. There is no evidence of fading out. Furthermore, the gains of ECEC are concentrated within children from lower socioeconomic families.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)206-222
Number of pages17
JournalEconomics of Education Review
Volume66
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2018

Keywords

  • Preschool
  • Child care
  • Universal ECEC
  • Child development
  • Meta-analysis

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Do Children Benefit from Universal Early Childhood Education and Care? A Meta-Analysis of Evidence from Natural Experiments'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this