Abstract
The necessity for public sector actors to manage multiple accountabilities in their work has been linked to a number of problems and failures, yet we lack an understanding of how multiple accountabilities affect the decision-making behavior of civil servants. Here we argue that the main issue is not only the existence of multiple forums as such but the presence of conflicting demands between multiple forums or within a single forum. Drawing on sociopsychological research, we develop hypotheses regarding two types of behavioral strategies (high-effort and low-effort) to cope with accountability pressures. We test this using a realistic vignette experiment on a sample of 270 Dutch regulators. Results show that both the multiplicity of forums and the conflict of demands affect the likelihood that regulators seek help and procrastinate. The main issue is the conflicting demands that have a stronger effect on behavior than forum multiplicity.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 711-736 |
Journal | Public Administration |
Volume | 100 |
Issue number | 3 |
Early online date | 4 Jul 2021 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Sept 2022 |
Bibliographical note
Funding Information:This research has been enabled by NWO‐Vidi grant (452‐14‐008) from the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research. Calibrating Public Accountability
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 The Authors. Public Administration published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.