Disgust sensitivity relates to affective responses to-but not ability to detect-olfactory cues to pathogens

J.M. Tybur, I.M. Croijmans, D. van Huijstee, C. cinar, V. Lal, M.A.M. Smeets

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Hundreds of studies have assessed variation in the degree to which people experience disgust toward substances associated with pathogens, but little is known about the mechanistic sources of this variation. The current investigation uses olfactory perception and threshold methods to test whether it is apparent at the cue-detection level, at the cue-interpretation level, or both. It further tests whether relations between disgust sensitivity and olfactory perception are specific to odors associated with pathogens. Two studies (N's = 119 and 160) of individuals sampled from a Dutch university each revealed that pathogen disgust sensitivity relates to valence perceptions of odors found in pathogen sources, but not to valence perceptions of odors not associated with pathogens, nor to intensity perceptions of odors of either type. Study 2, which also assessed olfactory thresholds via a three-alternative forced-choice staircase method, did not reveal a relation between pathogen disgust sensitivity and the ability to detect an odor associated with pathogens, nor an odor not associated with pathogens. In total, results are consistent with the idea that pathogen disgust sensitivity relates to how olfactory pathogen cues are interpreted after detection, but not necessarily to the ability to detect such cues.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)284-295
Number of pages12
JournalEvolution and Human Behavior
Volume43
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2022

Keywords

  • Disgust
  • Disgust sensitivity
  • Olfaction
  • Odors
  • Pathogens
  • Behavioral immune system

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Disgust sensitivity relates to affective responses to-but not ability to detect-olfactory cues to pathogens'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this