Discussion points for Bayesian inference

Balazs Aczel; Rink Hoekstra; Andrew Gelman; Eric Jan Wagenmakers; Irene G. Klugkist; Jeffrey N. Rouder; Joachim Vandekerckhove; Michael D. Lee; Richard D. Morey; Wolf Vanpaemel; Zoltan Dienes; Don van Ravenzwaaij

doi:10.1038/s41562-019-0807-z

Discussion points for Bayesian inference

Balazs Aczel^*
, Rink Hoekstra
, Andrew Gelman
, Eric Jan Wagenmakers
, Irene G. Klugkist
, Jeffrey N. Rouder
, Joachim Vandekerckhove
, Michael D. Lee
, Richard D. Morey
, Wolf Vanpaemel
, Zoltan Dienes
, Don van Ravenzwaaij

^*Corresponding author for this work

Eotvos Lorand University
University of Groningen
Columbia University
University of Amsterdam
University of California at Irvine
University of Cardiff
KU Leuven
University of Sussex

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/Letter to the editor › Academic › peer-review

Abstract

Why is there no consensual way of conducting Bayesian analyses? We present a summary of agreements and disagreements of the authors on several discussion points regarding Bayesian inference. We also provide a thinking guideline to assist researchers in conducting Bayesian inference in the social and behavioural sciences.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	561-563
Number of pages	3
Journal	Nature Human Behaviour
Volume	4
Issue number	6
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-019-0807-z
Publication status	Published - Jun 2020

Access to Document

10.1038/s41562-019-0807-z

s41562-019-0807-zFinal published version, 688 KBLicence: Taverne

Cite this

@article{00116067e82443b38096d5ed0b764bc7,

title = "Discussion points for Bayesian inference",

abstract = "Why is there no consensual way of conducting Bayesian analyses? We present a summary of agreements and disagreements of the authors on several discussion points regarding Bayesian inference. We also provide a thinking guideline to assist researchers in conducting Bayesian inference in the social and behavioural sciences.",

author = "Balazs Aczel and Rink Hoekstra and Andrew Gelman and Wagenmakers, \{Eric Jan\} and Klugkist, \{Irene G.\} and Rouder, \{Jeffrey N.\} and Joachim Vandekerckhove and Lee, \{Michael D.\} and Morey, \{Richard D.\} and Wolf Vanpaemel and Zoltan Dienes and \{van Ravenzwaaij\}, Don",

year = "2020",

month = jun,

doi = "10.1038/s41562-019-0807-z",

language = "English",

volume = "4",

pages = "561--563",

journal = "Nature Human Behaviour",

issn = "2397-3374",

publisher = "Nature Publishing Group",

number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Discussion points for Bayesian inference

AU - Aczel, Balazs

AU - Hoekstra, Rink

AU - Gelman, Andrew

AU - Wagenmakers, Eric Jan

AU - Klugkist, Irene G.

AU - Rouder, Jeffrey N.

AU - Vandekerckhove, Joachim

AU - Lee, Michael D.

AU - Morey, Richard D.

AU - Vanpaemel, Wolf

AU - Dienes, Zoltan

AU - van Ravenzwaaij, Don

PY - 2020/6

Y1 - 2020/6

N2 - Why is there no consensual way of conducting Bayesian analyses? We present a summary of agreements and disagreements of the authors on several discussion points regarding Bayesian inference. We also provide a thinking guideline to assist researchers in conducting Bayesian inference in the social and behavioural sciences.

AB - Why is there no consensual way of conducting Bayesian analyses? We present a summary of agreements and disagreements of the authors on several discussion points regarding Bayesian inference. We also provide a thinking guideline to assist researchers in conducting Bayesian inference in the social and behavioural sciences.

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85078464723

U2 - 10.1038/s41562-019-0807-z

DO - 10.1038/s41562-019-0807-z

M3 - Comment/Letter to the editor

C2 - 31988442

AN - SCOPUS:85078464723

SN - 2397-3374

VL - 4

SP - 561

EP - 563

JO - Nature Human Behaviour

JF - Nature Human Behaviour

IS - 6

ER -

Discussion points for Bayesian inference

Abstract

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this