Discussion points for Bayesian inference

Balazs Aczel; Rink Hoekstra; Andrew Gelman; Eric Jan Wagenmakers; Irene G. Klugkist; Jeffrey N. Rouder; Joachim Vandekerckhove; Michael D. Lee; Richard D. Morey; Wolf Vanpaemel; Zoltan Dienes; Don van Ravenzwaaij

doi:10.1038/s41562-019-0807-z

Discussion points for Bayesian inference

Balazs Aczel^*, Rink Hoekstra, Andrew Gelman, Eric Jan Wagenmakers, Irene G. Klugkist, Jeffrey N. Rouder, Joachim Vandekerckhove, Michael D. Lee, Richard D. Morey, Wolf Vanpaemel, Zoltan Dienes, Don van Ravenzwaaij

^*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/Letter to the editor › Academic › peer-review

Abstract

Why is there no consensual way of conducting Bayesian analyses? We present a summary of agreements and disagreements of the authors on several discussion points regarding Bayesian inference. We also provide a thinking guideline to assist researchers in conducting Bayesian inference in the social and behavioural sciences.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	561-563
Number of pages	3
Journal	Nature Human Behaviour
Volume	4
Issue number	6
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-019-0807-z
Publication status	Published - Jun 2020

Access to Document

10.1038/s41562-019-0807-z

s41562-019-0807-zFinal published version, 688 KBLicence: Taverne

Cite this

@article{00116067e82443b38096d5ed0b764bc7,

title = "Discussion points for Bayesian inference",

abstract = "Why is there no consensual way of conducting Bayesian analyses? We present a summary of agreements and disagreements of the authors on several discussion points regarding Bayesian inference. We also provide a thinking guideline to assist researchers in conducting Bayesian inference in the social and behavioural sciences.",

author = "Balazs Aczel and Rink Hoekstra and Andrew Gelman and Wagenmakers, {Eric Jan} and Klugkist, {Irene G.} and Rouder, {Jeffrey N.} and Joachim Vandekerckhove and Lee, {Michael D.} and Morey, {Richard D.} and Wolf Vanpaemel and Zoltan Dienes and {van Ravenzwaaij}, Don",

year = "2020",

month = jun,

doi = "10.1038/s41562-019-0807-z",

language = "English",

volume = "4",

pages = "561--563",

journal = "Nature Human Behaviour",

issn = "2397-3374",

publisher = "Nature Publishing Group",

number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Discussion points for Bayesian inference

AU - Aczel, Balazs

AU - Hoekstra, Rink

AU - Gelman, Andrew

AU - Wagenmakers, Eric Jan

AU - Klugkist, Irene G.

AU - Rouder, Jeffrey N.

AU - Vandekerckhove, Joachim

AU - Lee, Michael D.

AU - Morey, Richard D.

AU - Vanpaemel, Wolf

AU - Dienes, Zoltan

AU - van Ravenzwaaij, Don

PY - 2020/6

Y1 - 2020/6

N2 - Why is there no consensual way of conducting Bayesian analyses? We present a summary of agreements and disagreements of the authors on several discussion points regarding Bayesian inference. We also provide a thinking guideline to assist researchers in conducting Bayesian inference in the social and behavioural sciences.

AB - Why is there no consensual way of conducting Bayesian analyses? We present a summary of agreements and disagreements of the authors on several discussion points regarding Bayesian inference. We also provide a thinking guideline to assist researchers in conducting Bayesian inference in the social and behavioural sciences.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85078464723&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1038/s41562-019-0807-z

DO - 10.1038/s41562-019-0807-z

M3 - Comment/Letter to the editor

C2 - 31988442

AN - SCOPUS:85078464723

SN - 2397-3374

VL - 4

SP - 561

EP - 563

JO - Nature Human Behaviour

JF - Nature Human Behaviour

IS - 6

ER -

Discussion points for Bayesian inference

Abstract

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this