Discourse-related V1 declaratives in Dutch

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

    Abstract

    This paper discusses two types of discourse-related V1 declaratives in Dutch. The first type involves a missing argument. In the position before the finite verb a referential 3rd person pronoun is deleted. The deletion of the pronoun is constrained by the recoverability condition, which requires that its referential features can be reconstructed from context. I will argue that only the deletion of a d(emonstrative)-pronoun is ‘topic drop’. Deleted topic d-pronouns are subject to the same syntactic conditions as overt topic d-pronouns. Like the overt d-pronoun, the deleted d-pronoun refers to the focus constituent of the preceding sentence. A deleted p(ersonal)-pronoun, by contrast, does not have a uniquely determined antecedent. It solely maintains the preceding subject referent. The second type of V1 declarative is found in so-called ‘narrative inversion’ in which all arguments are present, and no empty element needs to be postulated. Various types of narrative inversion and the kind of discourse relation they imply are discussed.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)149-164
    JournalLinguistics in the Netherlands
    Volume37
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Oct 2020

    Keywords

    • Dutch
    • topic drop
    • subject drop
    • narrative inversion

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Discourse-related V1 declaratives in Dutch'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this