Disambiguate or not? The role of prosody in unambiguous and potentially ambiguous anaphora production in strictly Mandarin parallel structures

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contributionAcademicpeer-review

    Abstract

    It has been observed that the interpretation of pronouns can
    depend on their accentuation patterns in parallel sentences as
    “John hit Bill and then George hit him”, in which ‘him’ refers
    to Bill when unaccented but shifts to John when accented.
    While accentuation is widely regarded as a means of
    disambiguation, some studies have noticed that it also extends
    to unambiguous anaphors [7-10]. From the perspective of
    production, however, no strong experimental confirmation was
    found for the ‘shift’ function of accented pronouns, which is
    due to the fact that production research has mainly focused on
    corpora [5, 6]. Hence, the nature of the accent on anaphors still
    remains obscure. By manipulating referential shift and
    ambiguity, this study explores the role of prosody in anaphora
    production in strictly Mandarin parallel structures. The results
    reveal a significantly higher F0 and longer duration for
    anaphors in referentially shifted conditions, suggesting that
    anaphoric accentuation signals a referential change in strictly
    parallel structures in Mandarin. No evidence was found that
    ambiguity plays a role in anaphoric accentuation. This finding
    challenges the general view on accented pronouns and will
    deepen our understanding on semantics-prosody relationship.
    Original languageEnglish
    Title of host publicationProceedings of Interspeech 2017
    PublisherInternational Speech Communication Association
    Pages1393-1397
    Volume2017
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Aug 2017

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Disambiguate or not? The role of prosody in unambiguous and potentially ambiguous anaphora production in strictly Mandarin parallel structures'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this