Diffraction analysis of strongly inhomogeneous residual stress depth distributions by modification of the stress scanning method. II. Experimental implementation

Matthias Meixner*, Tillman Fuss, Manuela Klaus, Martin Genzel, Christoph Genzel

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

The modified stress scanning method [Meixner, Fuss, Klaus & Genzel (2015). J. Appl. Cryst. 48, 1451-1461] is experimentally implemented for the analysis of near-surface residual stress depth distributions that are strongly inhomogeneous. The suggested procedure is validated by analyzing the very steep in-plane residual stress depth profile of a shot-peened Al2O3 ceramic specimen and comparing the results with those that were obtained by well established X-ray diffraction-based gradient methods. In addition, the evaluation formalism is adapted to the depth-dependent determination of the residual stresses inside of multilayer thin-film systems. The applicability for this purpose is demonstrated by investigating the residual stress depth distribution within the individual sublayers of a multilayered coating that consists of alternating Al2O3 and TiCN thin films. In this connection, the specific diffraction geometry that was used for the implementation of the stress scanning method at the energy-dispersive materials science beamline EDDI@BESSYII is presented, and experimental issues as well as limitations of the method are discussed.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1462-1475
Number of pages14
JournalJournal of Applied Crystallography
Volume48
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Oct 2015

Keywords

  • depth gradients
  • energy-dispersive diffraction
  • multilayer systems
  • Residual stress analysis
  • synchrotron radiation

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Diffraction analysis of strongly inhomogeneous residual stress depth distributions by modification of the stress scanning method. II. Experimental implementation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this