Differential susceptibility or diathesis stress? Testing longitudinal associations among parenting, temperament and children’s problem behavior

  • S.E.M.J. Stoltz
  • , R. Beijers
  • , Sanny Smeekens
  • , M. Dekovic

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

In this study we investigated longitudinal associations among parenting, children's temperamental negative affectivity, and internalizing and externalizing behavior. Second, we tested whether findings confirmed the diathesis-stress model or differential susceptibility theory when conducting stringent interaction tests. The sample included 129 children and their families. Parenting quality (age 5) was measured by parent–child interaction observations. Parents evaluated child negative affectivity (age 7) and teachers reported on problem behavior (age 12). Multiple regression analyses revealed an interaction effect of negative affectivity and parenting on externalizing behavior. Visual inspection suggested ‘for better and for worse’ effects of parenting for children with negative affectivity. However, more stringent tests failed to show convincing evidence for differential susceptibility theory. For internalizing behavior, negative affectivity may render children vulnerable regardless of parenting. Our results point at the importance of further testing interaction effects to distinguish between differential susceptibility theory and the diathesis-stress model.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)783-796
JournalSocial Development
Volume26
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2017

Keywords

  • diathesis stress model
  • differential susceptibility theory
  • externalizing behavior
  • internalizing
  • parenting
  • temperament

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Differential susceptibility or diathesis stress? Testing longitudinal associations among parenting, temperament and children’s problem behavior'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this