Differential effects of positive versus negative contact: The importance of distinguishing valence from intensity

Sarina J. Schäfer*, Mathijs Kros, Miles Hewstone, Katharina Schmid, Benjamin F. Fell, Eva Jaspers, Mathias Kauff, Gunnar Lemmer, Oliver Christ

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

More and more research is considering the effects of both positive and negative intergroup contact on intergroup attitudes. To date, little is known about what factors may differentially influence these effects. We propose that differentiating not only between positive and negative contact (i.e., its valence), but also considering the intensity (i.e., low or high positivity/negativity) of contact valence is critical to understanding contact effects. We predicted that intensifying positivity in the realm of positive contact would have a stronger effect on outgroup attitudes than intensifying negativity. We report evidence supporting this hypothesis from three experiments which manipulated the quality of feedback given during a cooperation task by a confederate who acted as a member of a student outgroup (two online: N = 87, N = 169; one in person: N = 78), summarized in an internal meta-analysis and a large survey of White British majority and Asian British minority members (N = 2,994). Our results suggest that intensity of valenced intergroup contact may be a key factor for resolving inconsistencies in the current literature on valenced intergroup contact.

Original languageEnglish
JournalGroup Processes and Intergroup Relations
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 23 Jul 2024

Keywords

  • contact intensity
  • contact valence
  • intergroup contact
  • positive–negative asymmetry
  • prejudice

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Differential effects of positive versus negative contact: The importance of distinguishing valence from intensity'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this