TY - JOUR
T1 - Development of cognitive processing and judgments of knowledge in medical students
T2 - Analysis of progress test results
AU - Cecilio-Fernandes, Dario
AU - Kerdijk, Wouter
AU - Jaarsma, A. D.(Debbie) C.
AU - Tio, René A.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
PY - 2016/11/1
Y1 - 2016/11/1
N2 - Background: Beside acquiring knowledge, medical students should also develop the ability to apply and reflect on it, requiring higher-order cognitive processing. Ideally, students should have reached higher-order cognitive processing when they enter the clinical program. Whether this is the case, is unknown. We investigated students’ cognitive processing, and awareness of their knowledge during medical school. Methods: Data were gathered from 347 first-year preclinical and 196 first-year clinical students concerning the 2008 and 2011 Dutch progress tests. Questions were classified based upon Bloom’s taxonomy: “simple questions” requiring lower and “vignette questions” requiring higher-order cognitive processing. Subsequently, we compared students’ performance and awareness of their knowledge in 2008 to that in 2011 for each question type. Results: Students’ performance on each type of question increased as students progressed. Preclinical and first-year clinical students performed better on simple questions than on vignette questions. Third-year clinical students performed better on vignette questions than on simple questions. The accuracy of students’ judgment of knowledge decreased over time. Conclusions: The progress test is a useful tool to assess students’ cognitive processing and awareness of their knowledge. At the end of medical school, students achieved higher-order cognitive processing but their awareness of their knowledge had decreased.
AB - Background: Beside acquiring knowledge, medical students should also develop the ability to apply and reflect on it, requiring higher-order cognitive processing. Ideally, students should have reached higher-order cognitive processing when they enter the clinical program. Whether this is the case, is unknown. We investigated students’ cognitive processing, and awareness of their knowledge during medical school. Methods: Data were gathered from 347 first-year preclinical and 196 first-year clinical students concerning the 2008 and 2011 Dutch progress tests. Questions were classified based upon Bloom’s taxonomy: “simple questions” requiring lower and “vignette questions” requiring higher-order cognitive processing. Subsequently, we compared students’ performance and awareness of their knowledge in 2008 to that in 2011 for each question type. Results: Students’ performance on each type of question increased as students progressed. Preclinical and first-year clinical students performed better on simple questions than on vignette questions. Third-year clinical students performed better on vignette questions than on simple questions. The accuracy of students’ judgment of knowledge decreased over time. Conclusions: The progress test is a useful tool to assess students’ cognitive processing and awareness of their knowledge. At the end of medical school, students achieved higher-order cognitive processing but their awareness of their knowledge had decreased.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84966549184&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3109/0142159X.2016.1170781
DO - 10.3109/0142159X.2016.1170781
M3 - Article
C2 - 27117670
AN - SCOPUS:84966549184
SN - 0142-159X
VL - 38
SP - 1125
EP - 1129
JO - Medical Teacher
JF - Medical Teacher
IS - 11
ER -