Development and validation of MyCommunication—Adults, a self‐report communicative participation measure

Nicole ter Wal*, Caroline B. Terwee, Johanna M. A. Visser‐Meily, Eline Alons, Lotti Dijkhuis, Ellen Gerrits, Lizet van Ewijk

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Background
People with communication problems experience challenges in participation. Optimizing communicative participation for this population is an important outcome of speech and language therapy. Participation experiences are best assessed from the patient's perspective, using a patient-reported outcome measure (PROM). The Communicative Participation Item Bank (CPIB) has been developed to identify perceived problems in communicative participation. However, previous research has shown that the item bank does not cover all domains and concepts of communicative participation, contains general communication items, and is not suitable for all people with communication problems.

Aims
To develop a comprehensive PROM aimed at measuring communicative participation for all adults with communication problems and test its content validity.

Methods & Procedures
An initial pool of 242 items was based on three sources: relevant content from an earlier literature review and concept elicitation study, and the translation of the items of the CPIB. This item pool was pilot-tested for comprehensibility and comprehensiveness using cognitive debriefing interviews in adults with different communication problems (speech, language, voice, hearing and cognitive communication disorders). This resulted in a second version of the item bank. The content validity of this version was tested in a group of professionals. The last (third) version of 133 items was tested for content validity in a second, new group of adults with various communication problems.

Outcomes & Results
The initial pool of 242 items was developed and pilot-tested in 27 adults with different communication problems. After modifications, 161 items remained, which were tested in a content validity study with 25 people with different communication problems and five professionals (in the field of speech and language therapy and speech and language research). The professionals considered 91.9% of the item bank relevant and comprehensible, and comprehensive by adding two items. The item bank was then considered relevant, comprehensible and comprehensive by the group of adults with communication problems. A total of 133 items remained in the item bank, related to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) Activities and Participation domains ‘mobility’, ‘self-care’, ‘domestic life’, ‘interpersonal interactions and relationships’, ‘major life areas’ and ‘community, social and civic life’.

Conclusions & Implications
MyCommunication—Adults is an item bank for measuring communicative participation in adults with communication difficulties. The next step is to test the psychometric properties of the item bank, in order to establish a final item bank. The refined description of the construct of communicative participation can already be used for participation-focused goal-setting between individuals with communication problems and speech and language therapists.

WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS
What is already known on the subject
The CPIB was developed to measure communicative participation in community-dwelling adults with communication problems. The item bank does not cover all domains and concepts of communicative participation, contains general communication items and not all questions seem to be relevant for specific target groups (e.g., hearing population).
What this paper adds to the existing knowledge
This study presents a refined description of the construct of communicative participation and the development of a new comprehensive PROM aimed at measuring this construct for all adults with communication difficulties. The development of the PROM is based on a previously conducted literature review and concept elicitation study. This study describes the development process of this new PROM, called MyCommunication-Adults, and the assessment of its content validity.
What are the potential or actual clinical implications of this work?
The refined description of the construct of communicative participation can be used for participation-focused goal-setting between individuals with communication problems and speech and language therapists.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2766-2785
Number of pages20
JournalInternational journal of language & communication disorders
Volume59
Issue number6
Early online date19 Sept 2024
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2024

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 The Author(s). International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Royal College of Speech and Language Therapists.

Keywords

  • adults
  • communicative participation
  • outcome
  • validity

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Development and validation of MyCommunication—Adults, a self‐report communicative participation measure'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this