Abstract
This national report is created within a European research project, commissioned by the Europe-an Commission, with the title ‘DETOUR – Towards Pre-trial Detention as Ultima Ratio’ that was conducted in 2016-2017. The research project aimed at exploring and analysing pre-trial detention practice, especially different ways of reducing the use of pre-trial detention in seven European jurisdictions (Austria, Germany, Romania, Belgium, Lithuania, Ireland and the Neth-erlands). Within the project we investigated whether pre-trial detention is used as ultima ratio (i.e. as a last resort) in these jurisdictions. In this context, both the availability (legally and prac-tically) and the use of alternatives for pre-trial detention were investigated. A focus also lies on the European Union (EU) mutual recognition instruments laid down in the framework decisions on the European Arrest Warrant (EAW) and the European Supervision Order (ESO). Both instruments have an impact on pre-trial detention practice, especially the ESO, which specifically aims at reducing the need for pre-trial detention by enhancing the possibilities to apply alterna-tive measures. Relevant questions in this respect are whether these instruments are used at the national level, and if there are challenges or hindrances in their use. More information on the DETOUR project can be found on the project’s website at <http://irks.at/detour/>.
In this national report, the Dutch theory and practice concerning pre-trial detention is explored, with a specific focus on the use of alternatives for pre-trial detention. This national report builds upon the working paper on the Netherlands that was published in October 2016, available on the DETOUR project’s website.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Place of Publication | Vienna |
| Publisher | Institute for the Sociology of Law and Criminology |
| Commissioning body | European Commission |
| Number of pages | 98 |
| Publication status | Published - Jan 2018 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Keywords
- Pre-trial detention
- Criminal Procedure
- Ultima Ratio
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'DETOUR - Towards Pre-trial Detention as Ultima Ratio: 2nd Dutch National Report on Expert Interviews'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.-
Pre-trial detention in the Netherlands: absolutely low, relatively high
Lindeman, J., Jacobs, P. & Boone, M., Jan 2024, European Perspectives on Pre-Trial Detention: A Means Of Last Resort?. Morgenstern, C., Hammerschick, W. & Rogan, M. (eds.). Abingdon: Routledge, p. 142-164 23 p. (Frontiers of Criminal Justice).Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Chapter › Academic › peer-review
Open AccessFile -
To have your cake and eat it too: A short history of EU's failure to harmonise pre-trial detention
Lindeman, J., Mar 2023, Of swords and shields: due process and crime control in times of globalization: Liber amicorum prof. dr. J.A.E. Vervaele. Luchtman, M., De Jong, F., Kristen, F., Ligeti, K., Lindeman, J., Tosza, S., Widdershoven, R. & Zaitch, D. (eds.). 1 ed. The Hague: Eleven, p. 339-347 9 p. (Pompe Reeks; no. 104).Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Chapter › Academic › peer-review
Open AccessFile -
Alternatieven voor voorlopige hechtenis in Europa en Nederland: de advocaat als onterechte sleutelhouder
Jacobs, P., Lindeman, J. M. W. & Boone, M. M., Mar 2019, In: Delikt en Delinkwent. 49, 3, p. 170-187 17 p., 12.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Academic › peer-review
Open AccessFile -
De praktijk van de Europese toezichtmaatregel: begin van een meeromvattende invloed van de EU op de voorlopige hechtenis?
Lindeman, J. M. W., Jacobs, P. & Boone, M., Dec 2018, In: Strafblad. 2018, 6, p. 30-34 5 p., 57.Translated title of the contribution :The European Supervision Order in practice: start of a broader influence of the EU on the practice of pre-trial detention? Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Academic › peer-review
Open AccessFile -
DETOUR - Naar voorlopige hechtenis als ultima ratio: Vergelijkend rapport
Hammerschick, W., Morgenstern, C., Bikelis, S., Boone, M. M., Durnescu, I., Jonckheere, A., Lindeman, J. M. W., Maes, E. & Rogan, M., Feb 2018, Vienna: Institute for the Sociology of Law and Criminology. 88 p.Research output: Book/Report › Report › Academic
Open AccessFile
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver