Abstract
This article analyzes deplatformization as an implied governance strategy by major tech companies to detoxify the platform ecosystem of radical content while consolidating their power as designers, operators, and governors of that same ecosystem. Deplatformization is different from deplatforming: it entails a systemic effort to push back encroaching radical right-wing platforms to the fringes of the ecosystem by denying them the infrastructural services needed to function online. We identify several deplatformization strategies, using Gab as an example of a platform that survived its relegation and which subsequently tried to build an alternative at the edge of the mainstream ecosystem. Evaluating deplatformization in terms of governance, the question that arises is who is responsible for cleansing the ecosystem: corporations, states, civil society actors, or all three combined? Understanding the implied governance of deplatformization is imperative to assess the higher stakes in future debates concerning Internet governability.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Journal | New Media and Society |
| Early online date | 23 Sept 2021 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2021 |
Bibliographical note
Funding Information:José van Dijck would like to acknowledge funding from the Horizon 2020 Research Project “Policy, Expertise and Trust in Action” (Peritia), Grant Agreement no. 870883. The other authors received no external funding.
Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2021.
Keywords
- Big tech companies
- Capitol siege
- Gab
- Internet governance
- deplatforming
- hate speech
- platform economy
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Deplatformization and the governance of the platform ecosystem'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver