Abstract
Groundwater systems are commonly defined as renewable or non-renewable based on natural fluxes of recharge or on estimates of aquifer storage and groundwater residence time. However, we show here that the principle of capture (i.e., how recharge and discharge change due to pumping) challenges simple definitions so that a groundwater system cannot be renewable or non-renewable in and of itself, but only with reference to how the groundwater is being used. We develop and propose more hydraulically informed definitions for flux-renewable and storage-renewable groundwater use, and a combined definition that encompasses both the flux-based and storage-based perspectives such that: renewable groundwater use allows for dynamically stable re-equilibrium of groundwater levels and quality on human timescales. Further, we show how a matrix of combinations of (a) the ratio of pumping rate to the maximum rate of capture along with (b) the response or recovery timescales implicit in this definition, leads to a useful four-quadrant framework for characterizing groundwater use, illustrated using case studies from aquifers around the world. Renewable groundwater use may inform pathways to groundwater sustainability, which encompasses a broader set of dimensions (e.g., socio-political, economic, ecological and cultural) beyond the scope of groundwater science. We propose that separating physically robust definitions of renewable groundwater use from the inherently value-based language of sustainability, can help bring much needed clarity to wider discussions about sustainable groundwater management strategies, and the role of groundwater science and scientists in such endeavors.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | e2022WR032831 |
| Journal | Water Resources Research |
| Volume | 59 |
| Issue number | 9 |
| DOIs |
|
| Publication status | Published - Sept 2023 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2023. The Authors.
Funding
MOC gratefully acknowledges funding for an Independent Research Fellowship from the UK Natural Environment Research Council (NE/P017819/1). MFPB acknowledges funding by the European Research Council under the ERC AdG scheme (101019185 ‐ GEOWAT). RGT acknowledges support of a CIFAR Fellowship (ref. FL‐001275) in the Earth 4D: Subsurface Science and Exploration Program. GF acknowledges funding from a Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada and the Global Water Futures program. Thank you to the 3 Reviewers, and the Associate Editor, whose input greatly improved the manuscript. Discussions and comments from Andrew McCallum, Martin Shepley and Adrian Healy, were also formative in improving the paper, but any mistakes are our own. This is Cardiff EARTH CRediT Contribution 17.
| Funders | Funder number |
|---|---|
| Canadian Institute for Advanced Research | FL‐001275 |
| Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada | |
| UK Natural Environment Research Council | NE/P017819/1 |
| European Research Council | 101019185 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 7 Affordable and Clean Energy
Keywords
- groundwater
- groundwater management
- renewability
- sustainability
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Defining Renewable Groundwater Use and Its Relevance to Sustainable Groundwater Management'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver