Defining and Measuring Scientific Misinformation

Brian G. Southwell*, J. Scott Babwah Brennen, Ryan Paquin, Vanessa Boudewyns, Jing Zeng

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

We define scientific misinformation as publicly available information that is misleading or deceptive relative to the best available scientific evidence and that runs contrary to statements by actors or institutions who adhere to scientific principles. Scientific misinformation violates the supposition that claims should be based on scientific evidence and relevant expertise. As such, misinformation is observable and measurable, but research on scientific misinformation to date has often missed opportunities to clearly articulate units of analysis, to consult with experts, and to look beyond convenient sources of misinformation such as social media content. We outline the ways in which scientific misinformation can be thought of as a disorder of public science, identify its specific types and the ways in which it can be measured, and argue that researchers and public actors should do more to connect measurements of misinformation with measurements of effect.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)98-111
Number of pages14
JournalAnnals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science
Volume700
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2022
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 by The American Academy of Political and Social Science.

Keywords

  • inaccurate claims
  • mass media
  • measurement
  • public science
  • social media

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Defining and Measuring Scientific Misinformation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this