Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Deductive and Abductive Reasoning with Causal and Evidential Information

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Conference contribution › Academic › peer-review

    Abstract

    In this paper, we propose the information graph (IG) formalism, which provides a precise account of the interplay between deductive and abductive inference and causal and evidential information. IGs formalise analyses performed by domain experts in the informal reasoning tools they are familiar with, such as mind maps used in crime analysis. Based on principles for reasoning with causal and evidential information given the evidence, we impose constraints on the inferences that may be performed with IGs. Moreover, we propose an argumentation formalism based on IGs that allows arguments to be formally evaluated.
    Original languageEnglish
    Title of host publicationComputational Models of Argument
    Subtitle of host publicationProceedings of COMMA 2020
    EditorsHenry Prakken, Stefano Bistarelli, Francesco Santini, Carlo Taticchi
    Place of PublicationAmsterdam
    PublisherIOS Press
    Pages383-394
    ISBN (Electronic)978-1-64368-107-8
    ISBN (Print)978-1-64368-106-1
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2020

    Publication series

    NameFrontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications
    PublisherIOS Press
    Volume326

    UN SDGs

    This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

    1. SDG 16 - Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
      SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions

    Keywords

    • Deduction
    • Abduction
    • Causal and evidential information
    • Argumentation

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Deductive and Abductive Reasoning with Causal and Evidential Information'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this