Abstract
In this paper, we propose the information graph (IG) formalism, which provides a precise account of the interplay between deductive and abductive inference and causal and evidential information. IGs formalise analyses performed by domain experts in the informal reasoning tools they are familiar with, such as mind maps used in crime analysis. Based on principles for reasoning with causal and evidential information given the evidence, we impose constraints on the inferences that may be performed with IGs. Moreover, we propose an argumentation formalism based on IGs that allows arguments to be formally evaluated.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Computational Models of Argument |
| Subtitle of host publication | Proceedings of COMMA 2020 |
| Editors | Henry Prakken, Stefano Bistarelli, Francesco Santini, Carlo Taticchi |
| Place of Publication | Amsterdam |
| Publisher | IOS Press |
| Pages | 383-394 |
| ISBN (Electronic) | 978-1-64368-107-8 |
| ISBN (Print) | 978-1-64368-106-1 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2020 |
Publication series
| Name | Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications |
|---|---|
| Publisher | IOS Press |
| Volume | 326 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Keywords
- Deduction
- Abduction
- Causal and evidential information
- Argumentation
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Deductive and Abductive Reasoning with Causal and Evidential Information'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver