Abstract
Decentralized online social networks appear to be a refuge for those who wish to leave or quit centralized platforms or mainstream social media. These two types of platforms are often categorically pitted against each other. We argue that the choice for decentralization is neither categorical nor binary but should be the outcome of nuanced considerations based on public values. The term “decentralization” encompasses both technical aspects and organizational aspects of a platform. To cement public values in platform design, a combination of both centralized and decentralized technological and organizational elements may be preferable over two uniform opposite categories. We present this decentralization framework as a heuristic for deliberation about the inevitable trade-offs between sometimes conflicting values.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Governing the Digital Society |
| Subtitle of host publication | Platforms, Artificial Intelligence, and Public Values |
| Editors | José van Dijck, Karin van Es, Anne Helmond, Fernando van der Vlist |
| Publisher | Taylor and Francis |
| Pages | 27-44 |
| Number of pages | 18 |
| ISBN (Electronic) | 9781040780220 |
| ISBN (Print) | 9789048562718 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - May 2025 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© The authors/Taylor & Francis Group, 2025.
Keywords
- Decentralized Governance
- Open-Source Software
- Organizational Structure
- Platform Interoperability
- Software Protocols
- Value Negotiation