Abstract
This dissertation reports on a study of the legal position of the person concerned in proceedings, in which the measure to confiscate illegally obtained profits is imposed and executed. The normative aspect of the review framework relates to the interests to be protected and honoured in applying the confiscation measure. The first interest is the presumption of innocence, prescribing that citizens cannot be expected to prove their own innocence. The second interest is the interest of restoration from the perspective of the person concerned. Application of the confiscation measure is to bring him in the financial position that existed prior to the criminal acts. The hypothetical lawful situation may thus be ‘restored’. The interest of restoration, however, is not absolute. It may be curtailed by the third relevant interest, i.e. the interest of rehabilitation of the person concerned. As it happens, the interest of restoration to a large extent ignores the socioeconomic consequences of imposing and executing the confiscation measure. These possible consequences may be a serious impediment to a person’s return to society and to his social functioning.
Original language | Dutch |
---|---|
Qualification | Doctor of Laws |
Awarding Institution |
|
Supervisors/Advisors |
|
Thesis sponsors | |
Award date | 1 Jun 2018 |
Publisher | |
Publication status | Published - 1 Jun 2018 |
Bibliographical note
Handelseditie verschenen bij Boom juridisch te Den Haag onder ISBN 97-894-6290-525-2 (Pompe reeks ; 92)Keywords
- Confiscation
- crime money
- asset forfeiture
- money laundering
- criminal law