Abstract
At work, members of negatively stereotyped groups often use coping mechanisms to deal with identity-based threat, such as moving toward or away from ingroups or outgroups. We investigate whether these coping mechanisms are related to fulfillment of or costs for key identity motives for wellbeing and motivation, namely belonging, self-efficacy, self-esteem, perceived control, and optimal distinctiveness. As such, this study provides an overarching picture of the potential consequences of using coping strategies for minority members’ identity as they deal with stigma at work. A weekly experience-sampling study was conducted among women with a migration background (N = 296 data points nested in 63 participants) on their experiences at work. Results showed that, in general, moving toward in- and outgroups was related to identity motive fulfillment, while moving away from in- and outgroups was related to costs for identity motives. Effects were strongest for moving toward groups and for identity motives efficacy, esteem, control, and belonging. Together, these results suggest the importance of moving toward groups at work for one’s identity.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Journal | Self and Identity |
DOIs | |
Publication status | E-pub ahead of print - 6 Apr 2025 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2025 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
Funding
This work was supported by an internal KU Leuven grant to Dorien Van De Mieroop and Colette Van Laar [Grant Number BLOZ/17/022], and an Odysseus grant from the Research Foundation of Flanders to Colette Van Laar [Grant Number G.O.E66.14N].
Funders | Funder number |
---|---|
KU Leuven grant | BLOZ/17/022 |
Research Foundation of Flanders | G.O.E66.14N |
Keywords
- ethnic minority women
- Experience sampling
- identity coping strategies
- identity motives
- women with a migration background