TY - JOUR
T1 - Cross-modal visuo-haptic mental rotation: comparing objects between senses
AU - Volcic, R.
AU - Wijntjes, M.W.A.
AU - Kool, E.C.
AU - Kappers, A.M.L.
PY - 2010
Y1 - 2010
N2 - The simple experience of a coherent percept
while looking and touching an object conceals an intriguing
issue: different senses encode and compare information
in different modality-specific reference frames. We
addressed this problem in a cross-modal visuo-haptic
mental rotation task. Two objects in various orientations
were presented at the same spatial location, one visually
and one haptically. Participants had to identify the objects
as same or different. The relative angle between viewing
direction and hand orientation was manipulated (Aligned
versus Orthogonal). In an additional condition (Delay), a
temporal delay was introduced between haptic and visual
explorations while the viewing direction and the hand
orientation were orthogonal to each other. Whereas the
phase shift of the response time function was close to 0 in
the Aligned condition, we observed a consistent phase shift
in the hand’s direction in the Orthogonal condition. A
phase shift, although reduced, was also found in the Delay
condition. Counterintuitively, these results mean that seen
and touched objects do not need to be physically aligned
for optimal performance to occur. The present results
suggest that the information about an object is acquired in
separate visual and hand-centered reference frames, which directly influence each other and which combine in a timedependent
manner.
AB - The simple experience of a coherent percept
while looking and touching an object conceals an intriguing
issue: different senses encode and compare information
in different modality-specific reference frames. We
addressed this problem in a cross-modal visuo-haptic
mental rotation task. Two objects in various orientations
were presented at the same spatial location, one visually
and one haptically. Participants had to identify the objects
as same or different. The relative angle between viewing
direction and hand orientation was manipulated (Aligned
versus Orthogonal). In an additional condition (Delay), a
temporal delay was introduced between haptic and visual
explorations while the viewing direction and the hand
orientation were orthogonal to each other. Whereas the
phase shift of the response time function was close to 0 in
the Aligned condition, we observed a consistent phase shift
in the hand’s direction in the Orthogonal condition. A
phase shift, although reduced, was also found in the Delay
condition. Counterintuitively, these results mean that seen
and touched objects do not need to be physically aligned
for optimal performance to occur. The present results
suggest that the information about an object is acquired in
separate visual and hand-centered reference frames, which directly influence each other and which combine in a timedependent
manner.
U2 - 10.1007/s00221-010-2262-y
DO - 10.1007/s00221-010-2262-y
M3 - Article
SN - 0014-4819
VL - 203
SP - 621
EP - 627
JO - Experimental Brain Research
JF - Experimental Brain Research
ER -