Crisis Management

S. Dyson, P. t Hart

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Political crises—episodes of threat, uncertainty, and urgency—present a devilish problem: A literal meaning of crisis is “turning point,” and the practical experience is one of complex choices made under stress. In crises, then, decision-making[CE1] is unusually consequential and unusually difficult. This chapter offers a schema of crises that is broader than the usual focus upon acute international confrontation, and suggests that tasks of reality testing, sense making, narrative framing, and lesson learning confront decision-makers during these episodes. We incorporate new theorizing on dual-process models that differentiates between automatic-affective and deliberative-cognitive systems. This new paradigm portrays human psychology as a mixture of automatic reactions and shortcuts on the one hand, and effortful, comprehensive information processing on the other.
Original languageUndefined/Unknown
Title of host publicationThe Oxford Handbook of Political Psychology
EditorsD.O. Sears, J.S. Levy, L. Huddy
Place of PublicationNew York
PublisherOxford University Press
Pages395-422
Number of pages27
Edition2
ISBN (Print)9780199760107
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sept 2013

Keywords

  • crisis
  • dual-process models
  • stress
  • heuristics
  • decision-making

Cite this