Abstract
Political crises—episodes of threat, uncertainty, and urgency—present a devilish problem: A literal meaning of crisis is “turning point,” and the practical experience is one of complex choices made under stress. In crises, then, decision-making[CE1] is unusually consequential and unusually difficult. This chapter offers a schema of crises that is broader than the usual focus upon acute international confrontation, and suggests that tasks of reality testing, sense making, narrative framing, and lesson learning confront decision-makers during these episodes. We incorporate new theorizing on dual-process models that differentiates between automatic-affective and deliberative-cognitive systems. This new paradigm portrays human psychology as a mixture of automatic reactions and shortcuts on the one hand, and effortful, comprehensive information processing on the other.
Original language | Undefined/Unknown |
---|---|
Title of host publication | The Oxford Handbook of Political Psychology |
Editors | D.O. Sears, J.S. Levy, L. Huddy |
Place of Publication | New York |
Publisher | Oxford University Press |
Pages | 395-422 |
Number of pages | 27 |
Edition | 2 |
ISBN (Print) | 9780199760107 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Sept 2013 |
Keywords
- crisis
- dual-process models
- stress
- heuristics
- decision-making