Abstract
At present, procedural justice theory has predominantly been used to explain defendants' satisfaction with the police, courts and prisons. It is unclear to what extent this theory is also applicable to lawyers. This study investigates to what extent (1) criminal defendants are satisfied with their lawyers and (2) procedural fairness characteristics and the effort of the lawyer are related to defendants' satisfaction with their lawyers. Data from the Prison Project were used: a large-scale research project among Dutch criminal defendants (N = 1479). Results suggest that generally, Dutch defendants are very satisfied with their lawyers. Variation in defendants' satisfaction with their lawyers can be attributed for a substantial part to procedural fairness characteristics.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 186-201 |
| Number of pages | 16 |
| Journal | Psychology, Crime & Law |
| Volume | 21 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 3 Sept 2014 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Keywords
- criminal defendants
- lawyers
- perceptions
- procedural justice
- satisfaction
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Criminal defendants' satisfaction with lawyers: Perceptions of procedural fairness and effort of the lawyer'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver