Abstract
The paper discusses the problem of selection for a that-clause
among verbs that take DP/PPs with propositional meaning. It is largely
assumed that whether a given verb selects for a that-clause is a lexical
property of the verb (or, equivalently, property of the unique theta-role
that would be assigned to the clause). I challenge this view providing
examples from Russian where the verb’s ability to take a that-clause
seems to be affected by such processes as passivization or perfectivization
of the verb.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages | 308-310 |
| Number of pages | 3 |
| Publication status | Published - 17 Nov 2011 |
| Event | The Eighth Young Researchers’ Conference on Typology and Grammar (2011) - St. Petersburg Duration: 17 Nov 2011 → 19 Nov 2011 |
Conference
| Conference | The Eighth Young Researchers’ Conference on Typology and Grammar (2011) |
|---|---|
| City | St. Petersburg |
| Period | 17/11/11 → 19/11/11 |
Bibliographical note
The Eighth Young Researchers’ Conference on Typology and Grammar (2011)Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'CP-celection is not (only) a lexical property: evidence from Russian'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver