Couples’ work schedules and child-care use in the Netherlands

Melissa Verhoef*, Anne Roeters, Tanja van der Lippe

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Various aspects of parental work schedules affect the opportunities and constraints that parents encounter when arranging care for their children. This study examined the extent to which the combination of couples’ work schedules was associated with their use of different types of child care, focusing on parental, formal, and informal child care. We considered multiple dimensions of couples’ work schedules, namely, the timing of work, schedule flexibility, and home-based telework. Data from a recent Dutch survey were used, including information about 1599 dual-earner couples with children aged 0–6 years. The results indicated that paid work during nonstandard hours increased the amount of parental child care that was provided by one parent while the other parent was working, whereas work during evenings, nights, and weekends decreased the likelihood of using both formal and informal child care. Results further revealed gender differences for nonstandard hours and schedule flexibility. We found stronger effects of mothers’ work schedules, indicating that a gender-neutral approach to parental work is not justified. These results indicate that the timing of parental work is important to consider when examining not only parental child care but also formal and informal child-care use. We provide recommendations for future research, specifically regarding the possible consequences for parental well-being.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1119-1130
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of Child and Family Studies
Volume25
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Apr 2016

Keywords

  • Child-care arrangements
  • Dual earners
  • Families and work
  • Paid work
  • Work hours

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Couples’ work schedules and child-care use in the Netherlands'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this