Could the local population of the Lower Rhine delta supply the Roman army? Part 2: Modelling the carrying capacity of the delta using archaeological, palaeo-ecological and geomorphological data

L.I. Kooistra, M. van Dinter, M.K. Dütting, P. van Rijn, C. Cavallo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

In this part two of a diptych of articles, we modelled and quantified the carrying capacity of
the landscape and the demand and supply of the Roman army in the western Lower Rhine
delta with wood and food in the period A.D.  – . The absolute volumes of the wood and
food were calculated (in m and kCal) and converted into surfaces needed (in km
). In addition,
the acreage of available land in the area was quantified (in km
). A comparison of these
various values reveals that the carrying capacity of the landscape was larger than hitherto
assumed. Initially, the landscape was not limiting for the total demand. However, the pressure
on the landscape increased due to a growing population, and because of this the upper limits
on the possibilities of production set by the landscape may have been reached in the second
century A.D. Furthermore, our calculations show that wood and food, especially cereals,
could be procured from agrarian settlements in the immediate surroundings. Therefore, the
local population was probably much more involved in the provisioning of the Roman army in
the Lower Rhine delta. It seems likely that the Roman army combined local provisioning with
extra-regional supply and long-distance transport.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)5-50
Number of pages46
JournalJournal of Archaeology in the Low Countries
Volume5
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 2014

Keywords

  • conceptual model
  • demand and supply
  • food and wood provisioning
  • limes
  • quantitative model
  • Roman army
  • Roman farming

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Could the local population of the Lower Rhine delta supply the Roman army? Part 2: Modelling the carrying capacity of the delta using archaeological, palaeo-ecological and geomorphological data'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this