Abstract
Previous findings suggested that the positive relationship between autonomy and learning outcomes (such as improved task performance) only holds up until a certain optimum level of autonomy has been reached. This assumption was investigated in an experimental study where 95 participants had to learn a computer task. During the learning phase, we manipulated autonomy, distinguishing among no, moderate, and full autonomy. The results revealed that, when learning a task, having autonomy is preferred to having no autonomy. However, increases in autonomy beyond a certain level (i.e., full versus moderate autonomy) will not yield additional advantages regarding the motivation to learn and learning outcomes, and may have disadvantages in terms of learning efficiency.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 292-313 |
| Number of pages | 22 |
| Journal | Journal of Social Psychology |
| Volume | 151 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 May 2011 |
Keywords
- autonomy
- exploration
- learning
- motivation
- task performance
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Costs and Benefits of Autonomy When Learning a Task: An Experimental Approach'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver