Correction to: Rewet without regret? Nutrient dynamics in fen peat exposed to different rewetting degrees (Biogeochemistry, (2024), 167, 5, (705-721), 10.1007/s10533-024-01139-x)

Annick van der Laan*, Jerry van Dijk, Karin T. Rebel, Martin J. Wassen

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/Letter to the editorAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

The original online version of the paper has been updated as it was considered that the N:PK ratios of the fertilizer used in the experiment could result in an ambiguous interpretation, and because the authors discovered a calculation error in one of the R-scripts used to prepare Fig. 3. Specifically: “N:P:K” should be replaced by “N:P2O5:K2O”. The correct sentence should read as follows: “Nutrients were manually applied by adding slow-release granules with a N:P2O5:K2O of 16:5:12 (Osmocote flower, slow-release 2–3 months), which resembled an N fertilization of 250 and 50 kg N/ha/yr in total.” Figure 3 was replaced as shown below: “N:P:K” should be replaced by “N:P2O5:K2O”. The correct sentence should read as follows: “Nutrients were manually applied by adding slow-release granules with a N:P2O5:K2O of 16:5:12 (Osmocote flower, slow-release 2–3 months), which resembled an N fertilization of 250 and 50 kg N/ha/yr in total.”

Original languageEnglish
Article number16
JournalBiogeochemistry
Volume168
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2025

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2024.

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Correction to: Rewet without regret? Nutrient dynamics in fen peat exposed to different rewetting degrees (Biogeochemistry, (2024), 167, 5, (705-721), 10.1007/s10533-024-01139-x)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this