Research output per year
Research output per year
Annick van der Laan*, Jerry van Dijk, Karin T. Rebel, Martin J. Wassen
Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/Letter to the editor › Academic › peer-review
The original online version of the paper has been updated as it was considered that the N:PK ratios of the fertilizer used in the experiment could result in an ambiguous interpretation, and because the authors discovered a calculation error in one of the R-scripts used to prepare Fig. 3. Specifically: “N:P:K” should be replaced by “N:P2O5:K2O”. The correct sentence should read as follows: “Nutrients were manually applied by adding slow-release granules with a N:P2O5:K2O of 16:5:12 (Osmocote flower, slow-release 2–3 months), which resembled an N fertilization of 250 and 50 kg N/ha/yr in total.” Figure 3 was replaced as shown below: “N:P:K” should be replaced by “N:P2O5:K2O”. The correct sentence should read as follows: “Nutrients were manually applied by adding slow-release granules with a N:P2O5:K2O of 16:5:12 (Osmocote flower, slow-release 2–3 months), which resembled an N fertilization of 250 and 50 kg N/ha/yr in total.”
Original language | English |
---|---|
Article number | 16 |
Journal | Biogeochemistry |
Volume | 168 |
Issue number | 1 |
DOIs |
|
Publication status | Published - Feb 2025 |
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Academic › peer-review