Cordless ultrasonic dissector versus advanced bipolar vessel sealing device for laparoscopic ovariectomy in dogs

Anneleen L Spillebeen; Sara S D S Janssens; Rachel E Thomas; Jolle Kirpensteijn; Sebastiaan A van Nimwegen

doi:10.1111/vsu.12640

Cordless ultrasonic dissector versus advanced bipolar vessel sealing device for laparoscopic ovariectomy in dogs

Anneleen L Spillebeen
, Sara S D S Janssens
, Rachel E Thomas
, Jolle Kirpensteijn
, Sebastiaan A van Nimwegen

Utrecht University

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Academic › peer-review

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare Sonicision cordless ultrasonic dissector (SCUD) to LigaSure vessel sealing device (LVSD) for laparoscopic ovariectomy (Lap OVE) in dogs.

STUDY DESIGN: Randomized, paired prospective clinical trial.

ANIMALS: Client-owned dogs (n = 22) presented for elective Lap OVE.

METHODS: Dogs were randomly assigned to one of two protocols: protocol 1 required the left ovary resected using SCUD and the right ovary using LVSD; protocol 2 required the left ovary resected using LVSD and the right ovary using SCUD. Duration of ovary excision, complications, surgical smoke production, and collateral thermal damage were compared between SCUD and LVSD. Total surgery duration, postoperative convalescence, obesity, mesovarial fat score, and technique-associated costs were also recorded.

RESULTS: Ovary excision was significantly faster with LVSD than SCUD. Surgical smoke production was significantly greater for SCUD than LVSD. Minor pedicle hemorrhage occurred 3 times with SCUD and one time with LVSD (not significantly different) and was easily corrected intraoperative. Presence of hemorrhage significantly increased ovary excision time. Technique-associated costs were lower for SCUD than LVSD. No significant differences were found in collateral thermal damage between SCUD and LVSD. Total surgery duration and convalescence time were similar to previous reports of Lap OVE in dogs at the authors' institution.

CONCLUSIONS: SCUD is a cost-effective alternative for Lap OVE, taking into account differences in technique and user preference.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	467-477
Number of pages	11
Journal	Veterinary Surgery
Volume	46
Issue number	4
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1111/vsu.12640
Publication status	Published - May 2017

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Access to Document

10.1111/vsu.12640

Spillebeen_et_al-2017-Veterinary_SurgeryFinal published version, 630 KBLicence: Taverne

6 Citations
2 Abstract
1 Meeting Abstract
1 Article

Comparison of two advanced bipolar tissue sealers for laparoscopic ovariectomy in dogs: Enseal G2 Articulating Tissue Sealer versus LigaSure Maryland Tissue Sealer/ Divider
Driessen, F., Grinwis, G. & van Nimwegen, B., 2022, p. o19. 1 p.
Research output: Contribution to conference › Abstract › Academic

Open Access
Laparoscopic Cisterna Chyli Ablation Combined with Thoracoscopic Thoracic Duct Ligation and Pericardectomy in 5 Dogs and 2 Cats with Idiopathic Chylothorax
van Nimwegen, B. & Kirpensteijn, J., 13 Jan 2021, In: Veterinary Surgery. 50, S1, p. O159 1 p.
Research output: Contribution to journal › Meeting Abstract › Academic
LAPAROSCOPIC DISTALPANCREATECTOMY FOR TREATMENTOF INSULINOMA IN DOGS: AN INNOVATIVE FLANK APPROACH
van Nimwegen, B., 13 Jan 2021, p. O159. 1 p.
Research output: Contribution to conference › Abstract › Academic
A laparoscopic approach for removal of ovarian remnant tissue in 32 dogs
van Nimwegen, S. A., Van Goethem, B., de Gier, J. & Kirpensteijn, J., 7 Nov 2018, In: BMC Veterinary Research. 14, 13 p., 333.
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Academic › peer-review

Open Access
File

Cite this

@article{950e3d38adc54a1caf1611de2ed2b863,

title = "Cordless ultrasonic dissector versus advanced bipolar vessel sealing device for laparoscopic ovariectomy in dogs",

abstract = "OBJECTIVE: To compare Sonicision cordless ultrasonic dissector (SCUD) to LigaSure vessel sealing device (LVSD) for laparoscopic ovariectomy (Lap OVE) in dogs.STUDY DESIGN: Randomized, paired prospective clinical trial.ANIMALS: Client-owned dogs (n = 22) presented for elective Lap OVE.METHODS: Dogs were randomly assigned to one of two protocols: protocol 1 required the left ovary resected using SCUD and the right ovary using LVSD; protocol 2 required the left ovary resected using LVSD and the right ovary using SCUD. Duration of ovary excision, complications, surgical smoke production, and collateral thermal damage were compared between SCUD and LVSD. Total surgery duration, postoperative convalescence, obesity, mesovarial fat score, and technique-associated costs were also recorded.RESULTS: Ovary excision was significantly faster with LVSD than SCUD. Surgical smoke production was significantly greater for SCUD than LVSD. Minor pedicle hemorrhage occurred 3 times with SCUD and one time with LVSD (not significantly different) and was easily corrected intraoperative. Presence of hemorrhage significantly increased ovary excision time. Technique-associated costs were lower for SCUD than LVSD. No significant differences were found in collateral thermal damage between SCUD and LVSD. Total surgery duration and convalescence time were similar to previous reports of Lap OVE in dogs at the authors' institution.CONCLUSIONS: SCUD is a cost-effective alternative for Lap OVE, taking into account differences in technique and user preference.",

author = "Spillebeen, \{Anneleen L\} and Janssens, \{Sara S D S\} and Thomas, \{Rachel E\} and Jolle Kirpensteijn and \{van Nimwegen\}, \{Sebastiaan A\}",

note = "{\textcopyright} 2017 The American College of Veterinary Surgeons.",

year = "2017",

month = may,

doi = "10.1111/vsu.12640",

language = "English",

volume = "46",

pages = "467--477",

journal = "Veterinary Surgery",

issn = "0161-3499",

publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",

number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Cordless ultrasonic dissector versus advanced bipolar vessel sealing device for laparoscopic ovariectomy in dogs

AU - Spillebeen, Anneleen L

AU - Janssens, Sara S D S

AU - Thomas, Rachel E

AU - Kirpensteijn, Jolle

AU - van Nimwegen, Sebastiaan A

PY - 2017/5

Y1 - 2017/5

N2 - OBJECTIVE: To compare Sonicision cordless ultrasonic dissector (SCUD) to LigaSure vessel sealing device (LVSD) for laparoscopic ovariectomy (Lap OVE) in dogs.STUDY DESIGN: Randomized, paired prospective clinical trial.ANIMALS: Client-owned dogs (n = 22) presented for elective Lap OVE.METHODS: Dogs were randomly assigned to one of two protocols: protocol 1 required the left ovary resected using SCUD and the right ovary using LVSD; protocol 2 required the left ovary resected using LVSD and the right ovary using SCUD. Duration of ovary excision, complications, surgical smoke production, and collateral thermal damage were compared between SCUD and LVSD. Total surgery duration, postoperative convalescence, obesity, mesovarial fat score, and technique-associated costs were also recorded.RESULTS: Ovary excision was significantly faster with LVSD than SCUD. Surgical smoke production was significantly greater for SCUD than LVSD. Minor pedicle hemorrhage occurred 3 times with SCUD and one time with LVSD (not significantly different) and was easily corrected intraoperative. Presence of hemorrhage significantly increased ovary excision time. Technique-associated costs were lower for SCUD than LVSD. No significant differences were found in collateral thermal damage between SCUD and LVSD. Total surgery duration and convalescence time were similar to previous reports of Lap OVE in dogs at the authors' institution.CONCLUSIONS: SCUD is a cost-effective alternative for Lap OVE, taking into account differences in technique and user preference.

AB - OBJECTIVE: To compare Sonicision cordless ultrasonic dissector (SCUD) to LigaSure vessel sealing device (LVSD) for laparoscopic ovariectomy (Lap OVE) in dogs.STUDY DESIGN: Randomized, paired prospective clinical trial.ANIMALS: Client-owned dogs (n = 22) presented for elective Lap OVE.METHODS: Dogs were randomly assigned to one of two protocols: protocol 1 required the left ovary resected using SCUD and the right ovary using LVSD; protocol 2 required the left ovary resected using LVSD and the right ovary using SCUD. Duration of ovary excision, complications, surgical smoke production, and collateral thermal damage were compared between SCUD and LVSD. Total surgery duration, postoperative convalescence, obesity, mesovarial fat score, and technique-associated costs were also recorded.RESULTS: Ovary excision was significantly faster with LVSD than SCUD. Surgical smoke production was significantly greater for SCUD than LVSD. Minor pedicle hemorrhage occurred 3 times with SCUD and one time with LVSD (not significantly different) and was easily corrected intraoperative. Presence of hemorrhage significantly increased ovary excision time. Technique-associated costs were lower for SCUD than LVSD. No significant differences were found in collateral thermal damage between SCUD and LVSD. Total surgery duration and convalescence time were similar to previous reports of Lap OVE in dogs at the authors' institution.CONCLUSIONS: SCUD is a cost-effective alternative for Lap OVE, taking into account differences in technique and user preference.

U2 - 10.1111/vsu.12640

DO - 10.1111/vsu.12640

M3 - Article

C2 - 28314072

SN - 0161-3499

VL - 46

SP - 467

EP - 477

JO - Veterinary Surgery

JF - Veterinary Surgery

IS - 4

ER -

Cordless ultrasonic dissector versus advanced bipolar vessel sealing device for laparoscopic ovariectomy in dogs

Abstract

UN SDGs

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Research output

Comparison of two advanced bipolar tissue sealers for laparoscopic ovariectomy in dogs: Enseal G2 Articulating Tissue Sealer versus LigaSure Maryland Tissue Sealer/ Divider

Laparoscopic Cisterna Chyli Ablation Combined with Thoracoscopic Thoracic Duct Ligation and Pericardectomy in 5 Dogs and 2 Cats with Idiopathic Chylothorax

LAPAROSCOPIC DISTALPANCREATECTOMY FOR TREATMENTOF INSULINOMA IN DOGS: AN INNOVATIVE FLANK APPROACH

A laparoscopic approach for removal of ovarian remnant tissue in 32 dogs

Cite this