Coproduction as a structural transformation of the public sector

Albert Meijer*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Purpose: Coproduction fundamentally changes the roles of citizens and governments. The purpose of this paper is to enhance the theoretical understanding of the transformative changes in the structural order of the public domain that result from the coproduction of public services. Design/methodology/approach: This paper builds upon both the literature on coproduction of public services, new public governance and on social contracts between citizens and the state to identify the nature, drivers and implications of the transformation. The argument is illustrated with examples from crime control and healthcare. Findings: The analysis identified an institutional misfit and highlights four key issues that are key to the understanding of the structural transformation of public services: compensation for time and knowledge resources, responses to new forms of (in)equality, risk of conflicts between citizens and re-organizing accountability. Research limitations/implications: The analysis highlights the need for further research into the implications of coproduction for government legitimacy, transfer of power, financial implications, representativeness and consequences for non-coproducing citizens. Originality/value: This paper links instrumental debates about the coproduction of public services to fundamental debates about the relations between government and citizens and identifies substantial issues that are raised by this structural transformation in the public domain and that require new responses.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)596-611
Number of pages16
JournalInternational Journal of Public Sector Management
Volume29
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 8 Aug 2016

Keywords

  • Coproduction
  • New public governance
  • Structural transformation

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Coproduction as a structural transformation of the public sector'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this