TY - JOUR
T1 - Contributing to sustainable and just energy systems? The mainstreaming of renewable energy prosumerism within and across institutional logics
AU - Wittmayer, Julia M.
AU - Avelino, Flor
AU - Pel, Bonno
AU - Campos, Inês
N1 - Funding Information:
The research leading to these results has received funding from the EU's Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under grant agreement No. 764056, PROSEU Project (PROSumers for the Energy Union: mainstreaming active participation of citizens in the energy transition). The authors would like to thank Thomas Hoppe, Rolf Kunneke and Aad Correlje for coordinating this special issue and providing comments to earlier versions of this article. We would also like to thank two anonymous reviewers for their critical-constructive comments.
Funding Information:
The research leading to these results has received funding from the EU's Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under grant agreement No. 764056 , PROSEU Project (PROSumers for the Energy Union: mainstreaming active participation of citizens in the energy transition). The authors would like to thank Thomas Hoppe, Rolf Kunneke and Aad Correlje for coordinating this special issue and providing comments to earlier versions of this article. We would also like to thank two anonymous reviewers for their critical-constructive comments.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 The Author(s)
PY - 2021/2
Y1 - 2021/2
N2 - Renewable energy (RE) prosumerism comes with promises and expectations of contributing to sustainable and just energy systems. In its current process of becoming mainstream, numerous challenges and doubts have arisen whether it will live up to these. Building on insights from sustainability transitions research and institutional theory, this article unpacks the mainstreaming by considering the range of institutional arrangements and logics through which these contributions might be secured. Taking a Multi-actor Perspective, it analyses the differences, combinations, and tensions between institutional logics, associated actor roles and power relations. Firstly, it unpacks how mainstreaming occurs through mechanisms of bureaucratisation and standardisation (state logic), marketisation and commodification (market logic), as well as socialisation and communalisation (community logic). Secondly, it highlights the concomitant hybridisation of institutional logics and actor roles. Such hybrid institutional arrangements try to reconcile not only the more known trade-offs and tensions between for-profit/non-profit logics (regarding the distribution of benefits for energy activities and resources), but also between formal/informal logics (gaining recognition) and public/private logics (delineating access). This institutional concreteness moves the scholarly discussion and policy debate beyond idealistic discussions of ethical principles and abstract discussions about power: Simplistic framings of ‘prosumerism vs incumbents’ are dropped in favour of a critical discussion of hybrid institutional arrangements and their capacity to safeguard particular transformative ideals and normative commitments.
AB - Renewable energy (RE) prosumerism comes with promises and expectations of contributing to sustainable and just energy systems. In its current process of becoming mainstream, numerous challenges and doubts have arisen whether it will live up to these. Building on insights from sustainability transitions research and institutional theory, this article unpacks the mainstreaming by considering the range of institutional arrangements and logics through which these contributions might be secured. Taking a Multi-actor Perspective, it analyses the differences, combinations, and tensions between institutional logics, associated actor roles and power relations. Firstly, it unpacks how mainstreaming occurs through mechanisms of bureaucratisation and standardisation (state logic), marketisation and commodification (market logic), as well as socialisation and communalisation (community logic). Secondly, it highlights the concomitant hybridisation of institutional logics and actor roles. Such hybrid institutional arrangements try to reconcile not only the more known trade-offs and tensions between for-profit/non-profit logics (regarding the distribution of benefits for energy activities and resources), but also between formal/informal logics (gaining recognition) and public/private logics (delineating access). This institutional concreteness moves the scholarly discussion and policy debate beyond idealistic discussions of ethical principles and abstract discussions about power: Simplistic framings of ‘prosumerism vs incumbents’ are dropped in favour of a critical discussion of hybrid institutional arrangements and their capacity to safeguard particular transformative ideals and normative commitments.
KW - Energy justice
KW - Institutional hybridity
KW - Institutional logics
KW - Mainstreaming
KW - Multi-actor perspective
KW - Renewable energy prosumerism
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85097252954&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.enpol.2020.112053
DO - 10.1016/j.enpol.2020.112053
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85097252954
SN - 0301-4215
VL - 149
SP - 1
EP - 11
JO - Energy Policy
JF - Energy Policy
M1 - 112053
ER -