Help & FAQ

Contradictory ECJ judgments on the enforcement of final national decisions: the principle of primacy versus the principle of national procedural autonomy

R. Ortlep, Melanie van Zanten

Research output: Non-textual form › Web publication/site › Professional

Original language	English
Place of Publication	REALaw blog
Media of output	Online
Publication status	Published - 2021

Access to Document

https://realaw.blog/2021/12/03/contradictory-ecj-judgments-on-the-enforcement-of-final-national-decisions-the-principle-of-primacy-versus-the-principle-of-national-procedural-autonomy-by-rolph-ortlep-and-melanie-van-zanten/

Cite this

Ortlep, R., & van Zanten, M. (2021). Contradictory ECJ judgments on the enforcement of final national decisions: the principle of primacy versus the principle of national procedural autonomy. Web publication/site, . https://realaw.blog/2021/12/03/contradictory-ecj-judgments-on-the-enforcement-of-final-national-decisions-the-principle-of-primacy-versus-the-principle-of-national-procedural-autonomy-by-rolph-ortlep-and-melanie-van-zanten/

Ortlep, R & van Zanten, M, Contradictory ECJ judgments on the enforcement of final national decisions: the principle of primacy versus the principle of national procedural autonomy, 2021, Web publication/site, REALaw blog. <https://realaw.blog/2021/12/03/contradictory-ecj-judgments-on-the-enforcement-of-final-national-decisions-the-principle-of-primacy-versus-the-principle-of-national-procedural-autonomy-by-rolph-ortlep-and-melanie-van-zanten/>