Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Conservation gap analysis for Erica (Ericaceae)

  • Michael D. Pirie*
  • , Stoffel P. Bester
  • , Robbie Blackhall-Miles
  • , Anina Coetzee
  • , Dan Crowley
  • , Ismail Ebrahim
  • , Alan C. Elliott
  • , Jaime Fagúndez
  • , Félix Forest
  • , Nigel Forshaw
  • , Rendert D. Hoekstra
  • , Martha Kandziora
  • , Ronell R. Klopper
  • , Rupert Koopman
  • , Seth D. Musker
  • , Nicolai M. Nürk
  • , Jo Osborne
  • , Salvatore Pasta
  • , Sebastian Pipins
  • , Itxaso Quintana
  • Anthony G. Rebelo, Paul Rees, Daniel Rohrauer, M. Marianne le Roux, Martin Smit, Victoria Wilman
*Corresponding author for this work
  • University of Bergen
  • South African National Biodiversity Institute
  • FossilPlants
  • Nelson Mandela University
  • Forestry England
  • Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh
  • University of A Coruna
  • Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew
  • University of Stellenbosch
  • Senckenberg Biodiversity and Climate Research Institute
  • University of Pretoria
  • University of Cape Town
  • University of Bayreuth
  • National Research Council of Italy
  • Imperial College London
  • On the Edge
  • Botanic Gardens Conservation International
  • HBLFA für Gartenbau Schönbrunn und Österreichische Bundesgärten
  • University of Johannesburg

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

The flowering plant genus Erica (Ericaceae) includes well over 800 species and nu merous formally described subspecies and varieties. Many of these are threatened in the wild. The Global Conservation Consortium (GCC) for Erica was established under Botanic Gardens Conservation International (BGCI) in order to collaboratively prevent species extinctions. To target this work, we need fundamental information on species distributions, conservation status in the wild, and representation in ex situ collections. In large, complex groups like Erica, such data are not necessarily avail able or easily accessible. Here, we document the current state of ex situ and in situconservation of threatened Erica species, identify knowledge and resource gaps, and set out priorities for future work. We further developed and consolidated the large body of data on Erica nomenclature, taxonomy, and diversity now openly accessible as a result of collaborative efforts, in particu lar through the World Flora Online (WFO), the e-Flora of South Africa, and contributors to the Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF). We obtained accessions data for living plant collections from BGCI’s PlantSearch and from botanic gardens directly, and wild distribution data from GBIF. We linked and summarised data in an updated version (4.03) of the openly available Erica Identification Aid to assist in prioritising work. Through discussions in the matic working groups of GCC Erica we identified further priorities for conservation action. The volume of openly available, georeferenced records for species has increased dramatically in recent years. Although fewer than half of threatened Erica taxa are in ex situ conservation collections, many more botanic gardens hold African/Cape species and could contribute to distributed meta-collections. The most urgent research gaps include undescribed and poorly understood diversity (particularly in South Africa and Madagascar) and shortfalls in up-to-date threat assessments. Between ex situ sites we need to establish accession-level comparisons of data and sharing of conservation grade material. We must improve knowledge of seed longevity and techniques for effec tive cultivation. We should secure species and collect data through collaboration with landowners and the public. Priority action in situ should include clearance of invasive alien plants as well as habitat restoration and reintroduction. Key statistics for Erica species: 1) Total: 830 species (excluding hybrids; plus 364 sub species and varieties). South Africa: 747 species; Madagascar/Mascarenes: 41; Tropical Africa: 25; Europe/Mediterranean: 21. 2) 45% species revised taxonomically since 1965. 3) 77% species recorded on GBIF in the last 10 years. 4) 90% species threat assessed (38% in the last 10 years). 5) 46 Critically Endangered (CR), 48 Endangered (EN), 95 Vulnerable (VU) (23% threatened). 6) 47% of threatened species in ex situ collections.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)199-236
Number of pages38
JournalNature Conservation
Volume63
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 6 Apr 2026

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© Michael D. Pirie et al. This is an open access article distributed under terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (Attribution 4.0 International - CC BY 4.0).https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Keywords

  • Botanic gardens
  • conservation
  • Ericaceae
  • taxonomy
  • threat status

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Conservation gap analysis for Erica (Ericaceae)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this