Conceptual difficulties when interpreting histograms: A review

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Histograms are widely used and appear easy to understand. Research nevertheless indicates that students, teachers and researchers often misinterpret these graphical representations. Hence, the research question addressed in this paper is: What are the conceptual difficulties that become manifest in the common misinterpretations people have when constructing or interpreting histograms? To identify these conceptual difficulties, we conducted a narrative systematic literature review and identified 86 publications reporting or containing misinterpretations. The misinterpretations were clustered and—through abduction—connected to difficulties with statistical concepts. The analysis revealed that most of these conceptual difficulties relate to two big ideas in statistics: data (e.g., number of variables and measurement level) and distribution (shape, centre and variability or spread). These big ideas are depicted differently in histograms compared to, for example, case-value plots. Our overview can help teachers and researchers to address common misinterpretations more generally instead of remediating them each individually.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)100291
Number of pages26
JournalEducational Research Review
Volume28
Early online date18 Sept 2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sept 2019

Keywords

  • statistics education
  • histogram
  • big ideas of statistics
  • misconception
  • statistical concepts
  • statistical knowledge for teaching (SKT)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Conceptual difficulties when interpreting histograms: A review'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this