Compulsory treatment in anorexia nervosa: A review

Isis F F M Elzakkers, Unna N Danner, Hans W Hoek, Ulrike Schmidt, Annemarie A van Elburg

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Compulsory in-patient refeeding of patients with severe anorexia nervosa (AN) has caused considerable controversy. The effects of such treatment on longer-term outcome are not well known. The objective of this article is to review the evidence on the outcome of compulsory treatment for AN.

METHOD: Three large databases were searched for studies regarding compulsory treatment in AN.

RESULTS: Detained patients have more severe symptoms and comorbidity and a longer duration of inpatient stay. In the short term compulsory refeeding in AN appears to be beneficial, but the longer term effects remain uncertain. Clinicians report no worsening of the therapeutic relationship after compulsory treatment.

DISCUSSION: In severe cases of AN where the patient refuses life-saving treatment compulsory treatment needs to be considered. Future research should focus on the longer term effects of compulsory treatment and also on questions related to mental capacity in AN. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. (Int J Eat Disord 2014; 47:845-852).

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)845-52
Number of pages8
JournalInternational Journal of Eating Disorders
Volume47
Issue number8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2014

Bibliographical note

© 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Keywords

  • anorexia nervosa
  • compulsory treatment
  • mental capacity

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Compulsory treatment in anorexia nervosa: A review'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this