Composition, architecture and biomechanical properties of articular cartilage in differently loaded areas of the equine stifle

Maria Fugazzola*, Mikko T Nissinen, Jiri Jäntti, Juuso Tuppurainen, Saskia Plomp, Nikae Te Moller, Janne T A Mäkelä, Rene van Weeren

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Background: Strategies for articular cartilage repair need to take into account topographical differences in tissue composition and architecture to achieve durable functional outcome. These have not yet been investigated in the equine stifle. Objectives: To analyse the biochemical composition and architecture of three differently loaded areas of the equine stifle. We hypothesise that site differences correlate with the biomechanical characteristics of the cartilage. Study design: Ex vivo study. Methods: Thirty osteochondral plugs per location were harvested from the lateral trochlear ridge (LTR), the distal intertrochlear groove (DITG) and the medial femoral condyle (MFC). These underwent biochemical, biomechanical and structural analysis. A linear mixed model with location as a fixed factor and horse as a random factor was applied, followed by pair-wise comparisons of estimated means with false discovery rate correction, to test for differences between locations. Correlations between biochemical and biomechanical parameters were tested using Spearman's correlation coefficient. Results: Glycosaminoglycan content was different between all sites (estimated mean [95% confidence interval (CI)] for LTR 75.4 [64.5, 88.2], for intercondylar notch (ICN) 37.3 [31.9, 43.6], for MFC 93.7 [80.1109.6] μg/mg dry weight), as were equilibrium modulus (LTR2.20 [1.96, 2.46], ICN0.48 [0.37, 0.6], MFC1.36 [1.17, 1.56] MPa), dynamic modulus (LTR7.33 [6.54, 8.17], ICN4.38 [3.77, 5.03], MFC5.62 [4.93, 6.36] MPa) and viscosity (LTR7.49 [6.76, 8.26], ICN16.99 [15.88, 18.14], MFC8.7 [7.91,9.5]°). The two weightbearing areas (LTR and MCF) and the non-weightbearing area (ICN) differed in collagen content (LTR 139 [127, 152], ICN176[162, 191], MFC 127[115, 139] μg/mg dry weight), parallelism index and angle of collagen fibres. The strongest correlations were between proteoglycan content and equilibrium modulus (r: 0.642; p: 0.001), dynamic modulus (r: 0.554; p < 0.001) and phase shift (r: −0.675; p < 0.001), and between collagen orientation angle and equilibrium modulus (r: −0.612; p < 0.001), dynamic modulus (r: −0.424; p < 0.001) and phase shift (r: 0.609; p < 0.001). Main limitations: Only a single sample per location was analysed. Conclusions: There were significant differences in cartilage biochemical composition, biomechanics and architecture between the three differently loaded sites. The biochemical and structural composition correlated with the mechanical characteristics. These differences need to be acknowledged by designing cartilage repair strategies.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)573-585
Number of pages13
JournalEquine Veterinary Journal
Volume56
Issue number3
Early online date27 Jun 2023
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2024

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
Instrumentarium Science Foundation, Academy of Finland (project number 307932), Kuopio University Hospital (VTR grant number 5041795).

Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 The Authors. Equine Veterinary Journal published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of EVJ Ltd.

Funding

Instrumentarium Science Foundation, Academy of Finland (project number 307932), Kuopio University Hospital (VTR grant number 5041795).

FundersFunder number
VTR5041795
Academy of Finland307932
Academy of Finland
Kuopion Yliopistollinen Sairaala
Instrumentariumin Tiedesäätiö

    Keywords

    • cartilage ECM fibre orientation
    • collagen type II
    • proteoglycans
    • stiffness
    • topographical differences articular cartilage

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Composition, architecture and biomechanical properties of articular cartilage in differently loaded areas of the equine stifle'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this