Abstract
Many universal school-based interventions aim to stimulate students’ intrapersonal (e.g., self-esteem) and interpersonal
(e.g., school climate) domains. To improve our understanding of why some of these interventions yield stronger effects than
others, we identified intervention components that are related to stronger or weaker intervention effects. We systematically
searched four databases (i.e., PsycINFO, PubMed, ERIC, CENTRAL) for controlled evaluations of universal school-based
interventions. In total, 104 included studies (529 included effect sizes) reported on 99 unique interventions. Interventions
showed small positive effects on the intrapersonal (d = 0.19) and interpersonal (d = 0.15) domains. Focusing on self-awareness
and problem solving, using more active learning approaches, and using more extensive interventions predicted stronger
intervention effects on aspects of both domains. In contrast, efforts to improve emotion regulation, assertiveness, cognitive
coping, and using group discussions predicted weaker intervention effects. Furthermore, commonly implemented components
were not necessarily related to stronger intervention effects and components that were related to stronger effects were not
necessarily often implemented. Our findings highlight the need to carefully select components for inclusion in interventions.
PROSPERO Registration Number: CRD42019137981.
(e.g., school climate) domains. To improve our understanding of why some of these interventions yield stronger effects than
others, we identified intervention components that are related to stronger or weaker intervention effects. We systematically
searched four databases (i.e., PsycINFO, PubMed, ERIC, CENTRAL) for controlled evaluations of universal school-based
interventions. In total, 104 included studies (529 included effect sizes) reported on 99 unique interventions. Interventions
showed small positive effects on the intrapersonal (d = 0.19) and interpersonal (d = 0.15) domains. Focusing on self-awareness
and problem solving, using more active learning approaches, and using more extensive interventions predicted stronger
intervention effects on aspects of both domains. In contrast, efforts to improve emotion regulation, assertiveness, cognitive
coping, and using group discussions predicted weaker intervention effects. Furthermore, commonly implemented components
were not necessarily related to stronger intervention effects and components that were related to stronger effects were not
necessarily often implemented. Our findings highlight the need to carefully select components for inclusion in interventions.
PROSPERO Registration Number: CRD42019137981.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 605-631 |
| Journal | Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review |
| Volume | 23 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 3 Oct 2020 |
Keywords
- Components analysis
- School-based intervention
- Intrapersonal domain
- Interpersonal domain
- Students