Complex language, complex thought? The relationship between children's production of double embeddings and Theory of Mind

S.T.M. Hazenberg, P. Hendriks

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

It has been argued (e.g., by De Villiers and colleagues) that the acquisition of sentence embedding is necessary for the development of first-order Theory of Mind (ToM): the ability to attribute beliefs to others. This raises the question whether the acquisition of double embedded sentences is related to, and perhaps even necessary for, the development of second-order ToM: the ability to attribute beliefs about beliefs to others. This study tested 55 children (aged 7–10) on their ToM understanding in a false-belief task and on their elicited production of sentence embeddings. We found that second-order ToM passers produced mainly double embeddings, whereas first-order ToM passers produced mainly single embeddings. Furthermore, a better performance on second-order ToM predicted a higher rate of double embeddings and a lower rate of single embeddings in the production task. We conclude that children’s ability to produce double embeddings is related to their development of second-order ToM.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)28-40
Number of pages12
JournalLinguistics in the Netherlands
Volume33
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016

Keywords

  • Language acquisition
  • false-belief task
  • sentence embedding
  • Theory of Mind

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Complex language, complex thought? The relationship between children's production of double embeddings and Theory of Mind'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this