TY - CONF
T1 - Comparison of two advanced bipolar tissue sealers for laparoscopic ovariectomy in dogs: Enseal G2 Articulating Tissue Sealer versus LigaSure Maryland Tissue Sealer/ Divider
AU - Driessen, Floor
AU - Grinwis, Guy
AU - van Nimwegen, Bas
PY - 2022
Y1 - 2022
N2 - Objective: To compare ease of use and performance ofEnseal G2 Articulating (ENG2) versus LigaSure Maryland Vessel Sealing Device (LVSD) in laparoscopic ovariectomy in dogs.Study-design: Prospective randomized clinical trialAnimals: Client-owned dogs (n=21)Methods: Dogs admitted for elective 3-portal laparoscopic ovariectomy were randomly assigned to one of twogroups: ovariectomy using ENG2 on the left ovary andLVSD on the right ovary or vice-versa. Surgeries wererecorded on digital video and each ovary excision wasseparately assessed for fat score of the ovarian ligament,smoke formation, occurrence of bleeding, and excisionduration. Excised tissue was examined histologically andeach specimen was scored on a qualitative and quantitative basis for collateral thermal damage in three zones:uterine junction, vascular pedicle and suspensoryligament.Results: Excision times were significantly increased forENG2 compared to LVSD (median LVSD 01:00m;median ENG2 01:35m). Bleeding occurred in 3 sites in2 patients (2x ENG2, 1x LVSD), which was not significant. There was no significant difference between the useof ENG2 and LVSD concerning smoke production asscored on videos and thermal tissue damage scores onhistology. Subjectively, the articulating feature of ENG2did not improve surgical performance in laparoscopicovariectomy.Conclusion: ENG2 provides a good alternative to LVSD inlaparoscopic ovariectomy, with no, or only minor, differences in measured variables. However, differences in operating these devices may be subject to personal preference.
AB - Objective: To compare ease of use and performance ofEnseal G2 Articulating (ENG2) versus LigaSure Maryland Vessel Sealing Device (LVSD) in laparoscopic ovariectomy in dogs.Study-design: Prospective randomized clinical trialAnimals: Client-owned dogs (n=21)Methods: Dogs admitted for elective 3-portal laparoscopic ovariectomy were randomly assigned to one of twogroups: ovariectomy using ENG2 on the left ovary andLVSD on the right ovary or vice-versa. Surgeries wererecorded on digital video and each ovary excision wasseparately assessed for fat score of the ovarian ligament,smoke formation, occurrence of bleeding, and excisionduration. Excised tissue was examined histologically andeach specimen was scored on a qualitative and quantitative basis for collateral thermal damage in three zones:uterine junction, vascular pedicle and suspensoryligament.Results: Excision times were significantly increased forENG2 compared to LVSD (median LVSD 01:00m;median ENG2 01:35m). Bleeding occurred in 3 sites in2 patients (2x ENG2, 1x LVSD), which was not significant. There was no significant difference between the useof ENG2 and LVSD concerning smoke production asscored on videos and thermal tissue damage scores onhistology. Subjectively, the articulating feature of ENG2did not improve surgical performance in laparoscopicovariectomy.Conclusion: ENG2 provides a good alternative to LVSD inlaparoscopic ovariectomy, with no, or only minor, differences in measured variables. However, differences in operating these devices may be subject to personal preference.
M3 - Abstract
SP - o19
T2 - Veterinary Endoscopy Society
Y2 - 1 June 2022 through 3 June 2022
ER -