Comparison of different climate regimes: the impact of broadening participation

Detlef P. van Vuuren*, Michel G.J. den Elzen, Jasper van Vliet, Tom Kram, Paul Lucas, Morna Isaac

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

So-far, most climate mitigation studies look at climate policy strategies in a so-called first-best world, i.e. using the least expensive emission reduction options in all world regions and sectors. To explore the impact of limited participation of countries, we have run a set of scenarios that explore the impact of introducing a carbon tax in OECD, the BRIC countries (Brazil Russia, India and China) and the rest of the world. The results show that carbon taxes can effectively reduce greenhouse gas emissions. However, if low greenhouse gas concentration levels are to be achieved, early participation (in some form) of large developing countries is important to increase reduction potential. It should be noted that global carbon taxes (without additional assumptions) lead to relatively high costs in low-income regions. Cap-and-trade regimes have more flexibility to create a comparable distribution of costs amongst countries.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)5351-5362
Number of pages12
JournalEnergy Policy
Volume37
Issue number12
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2009
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Broadening participation
  • Climate policy
  • Global carbon tax

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison of different climate regimes: the impact of broadening participation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this