Comparison of Adverse Events in Pregnant Persons Receiving COVID-19 and Influenza Vaccines: A Disproportionality Analysis Using Combined Data from US VAERS and EudraVigilance Spontaneous Report Databases

Leonardo Roque-Pereira, Malede Mequanent Sisay, Comfort K. Ogar, Carlos E. Duran, Eugene van Puijenbroek, Daniel Weibel, Katia Verhamme, Miriam Sturkenboom

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

BackgroundAlthough multiple post-licensure studies demonstrated that coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) vaccines are safe for use during pregnancy, none of them have identified a signal of disproportionate reporting.AimTo assess the disproportionality in reported adverse events among pregnant persons receiving COVID-19 vaccination compared with influenza vaccines in spontaneous reporting databases.MethodsIndividual case safety reports (ICSRs) with COVID-19 vaccines (Pfizer, AstraZeneca, Moderna and Johnson & Johnson) and influenza vaccines were retrieved from spontaneous reporting databases in the Vaccine Adverse Event Report System (VAERS) and the EudraVigilance (EV) system between 1 December 2020 and 31 October 2023. Both datasets were combined through a common data model. Pregnancy-associated ICSRs were identified using adaptations to the European Medicines Agency (EMA) algorithm based on age groups and key medical conditions. We compared the disproportionate reporting of High-Level Terms (HLT) after COVID-19 vaccines of interest (e.g. mRNA vaccine) with another COVID-19 viral vector-based/protein subunit and influenza vaccines during pregnancy. The proportional reporting ratio (PRR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) was calculated using a combined dataset. PRR met the predefined criteria (PRR >= 2, lower 95% CI >= 2 and N >= 3), confirming a potential signal of disproportionate reporting (SDR).ResultsA total of 22,383 pregnancy-related ICSRs were included. Five associations met the PRR threshold: inborn errors of steroid synthesis 35.1 (95% CI 7.8-158.3); non-site-specific embolism and thrombosis 15.9 (95% CI 3.1-82.2); general signs and symptoms not elsewhere classified (NEC) 11.17 (95% CI 3.3-38.1); peripheral nervous system disorders congenital NEC 4.2 (95% CI 2.3-7.7); and vascular anomalies congenital NEC 3.7 (95% CI 2.4-5.6), all associated with viral vector-based/protein subunit.ConclusionsDespite this analysis, several statistical disproportionalities were identified during pregnancy; the case-by-case analysis shows that embolism and thrombosis require prioritized investigation through proper causal inference studies.
Original languageEnglish
Number of pages13
JournalDrug Safety
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 10 Jun 2025
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2025.

Keywords

  • Mutations
  • Safety
  • Vaccination

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison of Adverse Events in Pregnant Persons Receiving COVID-19 and Influenza Vaccines: A Disproportionality Analysis Using Combined Data from US VAERS and EudraVigilance Spontaneous Report Databases'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this