Comparing location memory for 4 sensory modalities

Hendrik N.J. Schifferstein*, Monique A.M. Smeets, Albert Postma

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Stimuli from all sensory modalities can be linked to places and thus might serve as navigation cues. We compared performance for 4 sensory modalities in a location memory task: Black-and-white drawings of free forms (vision), 1-s manipulated environmental sounds (audition), surface textures of natural and artificial materials (touch), and unfamiliar smells (olfaction) were presented in 10 cubes. In the learning stage, participants walked to a cube, opened it, and perceived its content. Subsequently, in a relocation task, they placed each stimulus back in its original location. Although the proportion of correct locations selected just failed to yield significant differences between the modalities, the proportion of stimuli placed in the vicinity of the correct location or on the correct side of the room was significantly higher for vision than for touch, olfaction, and audition. These outcomes suggest that approximate location memory is superior for vision compared with other sensory modalities.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)135-145
Number of pages11
JournalChemical Senses
Volume35
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 15 Dec 2009

Funding

This research was supported by MAGW VIDI grants 452-02-028 and 452-03-334 of the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (N.W.O.).

Keywords

  • Cross-modal comparison
  • Location memory
  • Multisensory
  • Object-location binding

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comparing location memory for 4 sensory modalities'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this