Comparative life cycle assessments of stand-alone and integrated green hydrogen and biofuel value chains: A case study on drop-in biocrude, biohydrogen and biomethanol production systems

  • Richard Kingsley Padi
  • , Víctor González
  • , Keerthi Maran
  • , Angel Martinez
  • , Miguel Brandão
  • , Eliana Sánchez
  • , Martin Junginger*
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Biofuel production systems integration with green hydrogen (e.g., from proton exchange membrane electrolysers- PEM) can enable product yield improvements (e.g., gasification based biomethanol via hydrogenation of carbon-oxides) or co-production of synthetic methanol through hydrogenation of captured CO2. Environmental impact of these integrations compared to stand-alone systems is unknown. This study evaluates and compares the environmental performance of wood chip-based biofuel production systems, including advanced biocrude fuel (ABF), biomethanol (BMeOH), and biohydrogen (BH2), in stand-alone and integrated configurations with PEM-based hydrogen. The approach involved consequential life cycle analysis, focused on cradle-to-gate global warming potential (GWP), terrestrial acidification (TA), freshwater eutrophication (FE), and land use (LU) impacts. Gasification-based biomethanol yield enhancement with PEM hydrogen shows specific environmental benefits (e.g., in TA) while synthetic methanol co-production with ABF negatively impacts overall environmental performance. High electricity demand of PEM, influenced by the marginal electricity-mix, contributes to these trends. For biohydrogen, two-stage gasification route is preferable over pyrolysis-gasification due to higher biochar yield, which provide credit for replacing pulverized coal. Among the investigated systems, the stand-alone gasification-based biomethanol is the most environmentally efficient pathway for utilizing limited biomass. Meanwhile, the stand-alone two-stage gasification-based biohydrogen and stand-alone ABF show promise for decarbonizing hydrogen and diesel economies, respectively. All the biofuel systems outperform fossil fuels in GWP but lag in other categories (ABF- FE/LU, BMeOH- TA/FE/LU & BH2- TA/LU). The study emphasizes the importance of less resource-intensive green electricity supply and electrified logistics (e.g., biomass transport via freight trains) in enhancing the environmental performance of biofuel production systems.

Original languageEnglish
Article number108138
JournalBiomass and Bioenergy
Volume201
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2025

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 The Authors

Keywords

  • Biohydrogen
  • Biomethanol
  • Drop-in biocrude
  • Green hydrogen
  • LCA
  • Synthetic fuels

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comparative life cycle assessments of stand-alone and integrated green hydrogen and biofuel value chains: A case study on drop-in biocrude, biohydrogen and biomethanol production systems'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this