Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Comparative analysis of lipid Nanoparticle-Mediated delivery of CRISPR-Cas9 RNP versus mRNA/sgRNA for gene editing in vitro and in vivo

  • University Medical Center Utrecht
  • Utrecht University

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

The discovery that the bacterial defense mechanism, CRISPR-Cas9, can be reprogrammed as a gene editing tool has revolutionized the field of gene editing. CRISPR-Cas9 can introduce a double-strand break at a specific targeted site within the genome. Subsequent intracellular repair mechanisms repair the double strand break that can either lead to gene knock-out (via the non-homologous end-joining pathway) or specific gene correction in the presence of a DNA template via homology-directed repair. With the latter, pathological mutations can be cut out and repaired. Advances are being made to utilize CRISPR-Cas9 in patients by incorporating its components into non-viral delivery vehicles that will protect them from premature degradation and deliver them to the targeted tissues. Herein, CRISPR-Cas9 can be delivered in the form of three different cargos: plasmid DNA, RNA or a ribonucleoprotein complex (RNP). We and others have recently shown that Cas9 RNP can be efficiently formulated in lipid-nanoparticles (LNP) leading to functional delivery in vitro. In this study, we compared LNP encapsulating the mRNA Cas9, sgRNA and HDR template against LNP containing Cas9-RNP and HDR template. Former showed smaller particle sizes, better protection against degrading enzymes and higher gene editing efficiencies on both reporter HEK293T cells and HEPA 1-6 cells in in vitro assays. Both formulations were additionally tested in female Ai9 mice on biodistribution and gene editing efficiency after systemic administration. LNP delivering mRNA Cas9 were retained mainly in the liver, with LNP delivering Cas9-RNPs additionally found in the spleen and lungs. Finally, gene editing in mice could only be concluded for LNP delivering mRNA Cas9 and sgRNA. These LNPs resulted in 60 % gene knock-out in hepatocytes. Delivery of mRNA Cas9 as cargo format was thereby concluded to surpass Cas9-RNP for application of CRISPR-Cas9 for gene editing in vitro and in vivo.

Original languageEnglish
Article number114207
Pages (from-to)1-11
Number of pages11
JournalEuropean Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics
Volume196
Early online date5 Feb 2024
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2024

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 The Authors

Funding

We would like to acknowledge Omina Elsharkasy for helping us with cell sorting to select high-expressing eGFP Hepa 1-6 cells. We are grateful to dr. Sander A.A. Kooijmans for the help with setting up the protocol for single cell flow cytometry of liver cells. This research was funded by the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO) Talent Program VICI, grant number 865.17.005.

FundersFunder number
Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek865.17.005
Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek

    Keywords

    • CRISPR-Cas9
    • Cargo format
    • In vitro assays
    • Lipid nanoparticles
    • Single cell flow cytometry
    • Systemic administration

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Comparative analysis of lipid Nanoparticle-Mediated delivery of CRISPR-Cas9 RNP versus mRNA/sgRNA for gene editing in vitro and in vivo'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this