TY - JOUR
T1 - Combining hazard, exposure and social vulnerability to provide lessons for flood risk management
AU - Koks, E. E.
AU - Jongman, B.
AU - Husby, T. G.
AU - Botzen, W. J W
PY - 2015/3/1
Y1 - 2015/3/1
N2 - Flood risk assessments provide inputs for the evaluation of flood risk management (FRM) strategies. Traditionally, such risk assessments provide estimates of loss of life and economic damage. However, the effect of policy measures aimed at reducing risk also depends on the capacity of households to adapt and respond to floods, which in turn largely depends on their social vulnerability. This study shows how a joint assessment of hazard, exposure and social vulnerability provides valuable information for the evaluation of FRM strategies. The adopted methodology uses data on hazard and exposure combined with a social vulnerability index. The relevance of this state-of-the-art approach taken is exemplified in a case-study of Rotterdam, the Netherlands. The results show that not only a substantial share of the population can be defined as socially vulnerable, but also that the population is very heterogeneous, which is often ignored in traditional flood risk management studies. It is concluded that FRM measures, such as individual mitigation, evacuation or flood insurance coverage should not be applied homogenously across large areas, but instead should be tailored to local characteristics based on the socioeconomic characteristics of individual households and neighborhoods.
AB - Flood risk assessments provide inputs for the evaluation of flood risk management (FRM) strategies. Traditionally, such risk assessments provide estimates of loss of life and economic damage. However, the effect of policy measures aimed at reducing risk also depends on the capacity of households to adapt and respond to floods, which in turn largely depends on their social vulnerability. This study shows how a joint assessment of hazard, exposure and social vulnerability provides valuable information for the evaluation of FRM strategies. The adopted methodology uses data on hazard and exposure combined with a social vulnerability index. The relevance of this state-of-the-art approach taken is exemplified in a case-study of Rotterdam, the Netherlands. The results show that not only a substantial share of the population can be defined as socially vulnerable, but also that the population is very heterogeneous, which is often ignored in traditional flood risk management studies. It is concluded that FRM measures, such as individual mitigation, evacuation or flood insurance coverage should not be applied homogenously across large areas, but instead should be tailored to local characteristics based on the socioeconomic characteristics of individual households and neighborhoods.
KW - Flood risk management
KW - Flooding
KW - Risk financing
KW - Social vulnerability
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84911382698&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.envsci.2014.10.013
DO - 10.1016/j.envsci.2014.10.013
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84911382698
SN - 1462-9011
VL - 47
SP - 42
EP - 52
JO - Environmental Science & Policy
JF - Environmental Science & Policy
ER -