Collective Psychological Ownership and Intergroup Relations

Maykel Verkuyten*, Borja Martinovic

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Whereas much social psychological research has studied the in-group and out-group implications of social categorization and collective identity (“we”), little research has examined the nature and relevance of collective psychological ownership (“ours”) for intergroup relations. We make a case for considering collective psychological ownership as an important source of intergroup tensions. We do so by integrating theory and research from various social sciences, and we draw out implications for future social psychological research on intergroup relations. We discuss collective psychological ownership in relation to the psychology of possessions, marking behavior, intergroup threats, outgroup exclusion, and in-group responsibility. We suggest that the social psychological processes discussed apply to a range of ownership objects (territory, buildings, cultural artifacts) and various intergroup settings, including international, national, and local contexts, and in organizations and communities. We conclude by providing directions for future research in different intergroup contexts.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1021-1039
Number of pages19
JournalPerspectives on Psychological Science
Volume12
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Nov 2017

Keywords

  • culture/diversity
  • intergroup relations
  • intragroup processes
  • ownership

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Collective Psychological Ownership and Intergroup Relations'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this