Collective outcomes and justice considerations in evaluating equalization of a special-education budget

Jan F. Ybema*, Mariët Hagedoorn, Bram P. Buunk

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

This study examined evaluations of a proposal to equalize the budget for special education across regions among 1,114 participants affiliated with either mainstream or special education in The Netherlands. In line with predictions, it was found that equalization was more positively evaluated as expected outcomes for the own region were more favorable, and as the procedures and distribution were regarded as more fair. Moreover, equalization was evaluated more positively as referent distributions were rated as less fair. This research shows that perceived quality and fairness of a policy measure are strongly related to the perceived favorability of collective outcomes.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)570-589
Number of pages20
JournalJournal of Applied Social Psychology
Volume32
Issue number3
Publication statusPublished - 20 Aug 2002
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Collective outcomes and justice considerations in evaluating equalization of a special-education budget'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this