Cobalt particle size effects on catalytic performance for ethanol steam reforming - Smaller is better

  • Andre L M Da Silva
  • , Johan P. Den Breejen
  • , Lisiane V. Mattos
  • , Johannes H. Bitter
  • , Krijn P. De Jong
  • , Fábio B. Noronha

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

    Abstract

    The effect of the cobalt particle size in the ethanol steam reforming reaction at 773 K for hydrogen production was investigated using cobalt on carbon nanofiber catalysts. It was found that the turnover frequency increases with decreasing Co particle size, which was attributed to the increasing fraction of edge and corner surface sites with decreasing size. Regarding catalyst stability, a decrease in deactivation rate was observed with decreasing cobalt particle size. This was caused by a significantly lower amount of carbon deposition on the smallest Co particles than on larger ones, as concluded from transmission electron microscopy measurements. The reduced amount of carbon deposition is ascribed to a lower fraction of terrace atoms, proposed to be responsible for initiation of carbon deposition on catalysts with large (>10 nm) Co particles. Therefore, it was concluded for this non-noble metal that the smallest particles perform best in catalysis of ethanol steam reforming.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)67-74
    Number of pages8
    JournalJournal of Catalysis
    Volume318
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Oct 2014

    UN SDGs

    This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

    1. SDG 7 - Affordable and Clean Energy
      SDG 7 Affordable and Clean Energy

    Keywords

    • Catalyst stability
    • Cobalt on carbon nanofibers (Co/CNF)
    • Cobalt particle size effects
    • Coke formation
    • Steam reforming of ethanol

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Cobalt particle size effects on catalytic performance for ethanol steam reforming - Smaller is better'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this