Cleaning up the big muddy: A meta-synthesis of the research on the social impact of dams

Julian Kirchherr, Huw Pohlner, Katrina J. Charles

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Scholars have been exploring the social impacts of dams for over 50 years, but a lack of systematic approaches has resulted in many research gaps remaining. This paper presents the first systematic review of the literature on the social impacts of dams. For this purpose, we built a sample of 217 articles published in the past 25 years via key word searches, expert consultations and bibliography reviews. All articles were assessed against an aggregate matrix framework on the social impact of dams, which combines 27 existing frameworks. We find that existing literature is highly biased with regard to: perspective (45% negative versus 5% positive); dam size (large dams are overrepresented); spatial focus (on the resettlement area); and temporal focus (5–10 years ex-post resettlement). Additionally, there is bias in terms of whose views are included, with those of dam developers rarely examined by scholars. These gaps need to be addressed in future research to advance our knowledge on the social impact of dams to support more transparency in the trade-offs being made in dam development decisions.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)115-125
JournalEnvironmental Impact Assessment Review
Volume60
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sept 2016
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Large dams
  • Hydropower
  • Social impact
  • Resettlement
  • Meta-synthesis
  • Framework

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Cleaning up the big muddy: A meta-synthesis of the research on the social impact of dams'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this