Cinema-going in German-occupied Territory in the Second World War. The Impact of Film Market Regulations on Supply and Demand in Brno, Brussels, Krakow and The Hague

Clara Pafort-Overduin*, Andrzej Dębski, Terézia Porubčanská, Karina Pryt, Pavel Skopal, Thunnis van Oort, Roel Vande Winkel

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

This chapter analyses the effects of the policies of the Nazi regime on film supply and demand in four cities in four countries during the Second World War: Brussels (Belgium), The Hague (the Netherlands), Krakow (Poland) and Brno (Czechoslovakia, Protectorate of Bohemia and Moravia). We show that even though the German occupiers completely controlled film exhibition, distribution and production, still regulations and practices were somewhat geared to national and local cultures and film preferences. In Brussels, this meant that a large portion of French films could still be shown, and in Brno it meant that domestic production could maintain a relatively high output. In the Netherlands, German films obtained a virtual monopoly position. They had been popular from before the war, and this trend continued during the occupation. In Poland German films dominated as well, but the Krakow audiences stayed away when only German films were offered in the cinemas.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationThe Palgrave Handbook of Comparative New Cinema Histories
PublisherSpringer
Pages307-331
Number of pages25
ISBN (Electronic)9783031387890
ISBN (Print)9783031387883
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 23 Jan 2024

Keywords

  • Audience preferences
  • Comparative research
  • Film distribution
  • Film exhibition
  • Film regulations
  • Nazi regime
  • Second World War

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Cinema-going in German-occupied Territory in the Second World War. The Impact of Film Market Regulations on Supply and Demand in Brno, Brussels, Krakow and The Hague'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this